This is definitely a thing that can cause confusion, that's why I
think it should be consistent throughout. So one of these is
probably wrong:
[list(
|
[select]
(no method for 'list')
[list( | [print]
(no method for 'bang')
I don't have a clear idea of which is right, but I do think that they
should give the same error.
.hc
On Sep 5, 2007, at 8:05 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
Supposedly, "list" and "bang" are identical. I think the right way to print an empty list is to print "bang". But then again, if you're
asked what the selector is, I suppose it could be legitimately described as either 'list' or 'bang' - each carries a risk of confusion.cheers Miller
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:50:36AM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 19:19 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
If [list( is equal to [bang( then it always needs to be equal to [bang(. Right now, it is only sometimes equal to [bang(
have you already tried this:
[list( | [print]
pd-window says: 'print: bang' . i admit, i didn't know that
before, but it seems somehow consistent, that an empty list is equal to
'bang'. do you know a case, where it is handled differently?roman
___________________________________________________________ Der fr?he Vogel f?ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo!
Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.