18 Sep
2007
18 Sep
'07
9:24 a.m.
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:59 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
hard off wrote:
i got it!
a settable send using only pd vanilla objects.
why don't you just use [send] instead of [setsend]? i don't see any added functionality in this abstraction (but an added dependency on the abstraction)
are you reading the list?
yes i am.
it's about to overcome the problem, that the settable [send] is an only
=0.40 feature.
i am not talking about using the new (set) feature of [send], but about replacing [setsend] with [send].
have you had a look at [setsend]?
[inlet] | [send $1]
which is a wrapper for [send]: it has the very same functionality (in any version of pd)
fmadsr. IOhannes