This isn't a standard feedback suppression system that I am after. I
want to be able to play with the feedback while having the ability to
prevent it from taking over. Its part of an interactive installation
I am working on, the next generation of this:
The autocorrelation stuff sounds interesting, plus I just found Ed
Kelly's [peakit~], which gives amplitude info of FFT channels.
.hc
On Jul 31, 2006, at 10:23 AM, padawan12 wrote:
Feeback tends toward periodicity at 1/t for a delay of t so you could do an autocorrelation (expensive - does Pd have an object to help with that?) of te feedback signal to look for it. Since you know the frequency in advance a simple bp filter is more effective. Not sure what you mean by "dominant" part. If gain is greater than unity then it will eventually be, but if you think of a Karplus=Strong it is by definition once the excitory signal has vanished. Am I understanding your question(?) if I say the best way is to simply monitor the
amplitude , because if G>1 the amplitude will *always* keep growing.On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:07:12 -0400 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
Has anyone done anything with trying to detect feedback in a signal? I am not looking so much for feedback suppression techniques, but rather detection techniques. I am working on a system that has a slow feedback loop. I want to detect when feedback is the dominant part of the signal, and make the system respond in novel ways.
.hc
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams