1 Sep
2011
1 Sep
'11
10:50 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-08-31 16:11, Michael Zacherl. wrote:
despite what IOhannes pointed out (and I still agree with him)
i do not doubt that there are many use cases where it is indeed a better idea to avoid connections in favour of an accessing memory by name.
i only wanted to point out that it many cases it is not.
ghmsd IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5fR2gACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvSU5gCeKKvqh17jnKrb887TMZMuGbyG
TWQAnAv9Ym9wthVqXni77aljNiRJPmN5
=0Jt3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----