hi hans, well, in my case I installed Pd-0.39.3-extended and afterwards I double clicked pd-settings, but oscx is not loaded by default. any ideas why? could this be a bug? has anybody else had the same problem on windows xp?
about [range]: I used that object in a lot of patches, where it is often hidden und used in several subpatches, so it would be a hell lot of a work to find and replace it now in every patch by the [maxlib/scale] object. how could I avoid that procedure and use [range] like I used in it Pd-0.39.2-extended-rc3?
thanks, m.t.
oscx should be loaded by default in Pd-0.39.3-extended as long as you
have the default preferences that were installed by the installer.
Otherwise, you can add an [import oscx] to your patch, or prefix
those objects with "oscx/" like this:
[oscx/sendOSC] [oscx/dumpOSC]
[range] is most likely the old link to maxlib scale, so you can
replace [range] with [maxlib/scale].
.hc
On Jan 17, 2008, at 8:03 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Marko Timlin wrote:
Hi Iohannes, hi list members, as I worked on that patch for more than half a year I wouldn't
like to change it now. It has a lot of subpatches etc.valid argument.
So how could I add the C:\Programme\pd\extra\oscx patch so that Pd
autoloads it every time? The PD Patch menu seems to be full.might be able to add it in one of the existing lines by using the
colon: "/existing/path:/path/to/oscx"in Pd-extended you might also add it to the libraries.
i am no expert in this fields (neither pd-extended nor xp), so you probably want to save your pdsettings (in the registry) before
doing that.And: How can I make sure that PD loads all the available patchs????
i am sure that you don't want to do that.
if you just want to check whether all the objects have been found correctly, you should have a look at the pdconsole output after
loading and look out for "could not create" lines.fgmadsr IOhannes
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!