7 Jun
2015
7 Jun
'15
6:45 p.m.
no, but it's obviously more inefficient :)
it could be simpler if you were to use [change~], that was the tricky part for me
2015-06-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com:
- Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com [2015-06-06 17:17]:
the other day I implemented, just for fun, the [cyclone/slide~] object
with
[fexpr~], it's 100% compatible to vanilla. find it attached. cheers
Great! Did you have a chance to compare cpu useage between the two?