This would allow you to write bonafide Pd objects in snd. What
language they are written in would be transparent to the user. They
would behave just like objects. They could be bundled into libraries,
they would work with the system path settings, they would work in the
newly developing namespace, they could have their own help patches,
etc. etc.
.hc
On Feb 9, 2006, at 12:10 AM, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Hmm, I don't see the point. Having those extra four letters ("snd ")
shows that it is an snd object, and not an external or a patch. Whats
the point of hiding that information?On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It would be great if this was set up to use Pd's new generic loader
functionality. Then you could write Pd objects directly in Guile/snd
without needing the [snd] object. It looks like you are most of the
way there.There is currently a Common Language Runtime (C#, etc) API in the
works that is being ported to the new loader also.Basically, you just write a little loader program that tells Pd how
to load an object that is written in snd..hc
On Feb 8, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen wrote:
Hi, this mail is to inform that Bill Schottstaedt just put up
documentation for the snd pd external in the snd-manual: http://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/snd/snd/grfsnd.html#sndwithpd The documentation also also contains a screen-shot of a pretty neat stochastic pd patch made by Bill Sack, which use the snd external. If you know (and like) lisp, pd and snd, you should check this out... _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.
-
Eldridge Cleaver