Forgot to copy the list.... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Ivica Bukvic" ico@vt.edu Date: Feb 6, 2013 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ? To: "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr Cc:
On Feb 6, 2013 3:07 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
Hi,
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2013-02-06 14:20, Charles Goyard wrote:
I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, but I just wanted to point that out.
Gem's "install script" (aka Makefile) installs everything, including all compiled backends. what makes you say that there is a bug here?
You're right. I tried from crash with Gem alone and everything is ok: make clean git pull aclocal ./autogen.sh # ^-- btw this two commands are missing from the readme.txt ./configure --with-pd=/opt/pd-vanilla-0.43/ --prefix=/opt/gem
2 questions:
- Why are you compiling gem separately when pd-l2ork compiles it for you
and includes it with its binary package?
- Why are you trying to use pd-vanilla includes with pd-l2ork (unless you
are using pd instead of pd-l2ork)? The two are not compatible and as I indicated on the site with a huge warning box mixing the two will cause crashes and unexpected behavior.
make sudo make install
When all goes smooth on first time, everything is ok. However, it seems that if something fails during compilation and you rerun make, then the .so files are not copied if they were produced by the former run of make. It already occured to me when building pd-extended a few months back. It can be a dependency problem in the various targets, a bug in make, something wrong with my system, a personal problem with my cat... Whatever the cause, I get a source directory with everything: sources, gem.pd_linux and *.so, and an install directory with everything but the *.so files (yes, the gem.pd_linux gets copied).
I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, so apologizes for using the wrong word. Maybe it's worth writing in the README.txt what a make clean can be necessary on some cases.
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
How did you install pd-l2ork?
From source with archlinux's PKGBUILD, with cwiid missing. So I first ran a build, which failed, and then fixed the problem, rerun the build and got into the problems described above.
Again, I need as much information as possible about how you installed
the
software.
Well, I'll say the problem comes from make/fix/make. Obviously it's not that important at all. There is/was the same kind of problem in pd-extended with ln -s other existing symlimks that forces you to clean and rebuild everything (I reported that on sf) after hours of compilation just because a symlink exists. Annoying ain't it ?
Thank you all for your being patient :), and of course for your great software !
-- Charles
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->