Marc Lavallée skrev:
What's the problem about porting and extending software, or using code from some other software to kickstart a more ambitious project? That's a very common practice with free software. Look at the changelog.
That is not what i said. i was trying to get the point across that pidip is not effectv, and that system requirements for effectv has absolutely nothing to do with pidip. And i was pretty much saying, allthough not in so many words, the exact same thing as you are. it's one of the great benefits of open-source software. The problem was that someone thinks pidip is somehow only effectv, which it is not.
.thomas