My thought was that a wrapper object would be something that interested parties could put together on our/their own to get the language interface figured out, and then if it turned out that it worked well and people liked it then it could be integrated more tightly.
-s
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015, at 03:47 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 08/17/2015 09:24 PM, Spencer Russell wrote:
and maybe the object would be called [jl~] so you could instantiate [jl~ CoolNoise] and it would use your julia code to process blocks of audio.
hopefully, there will be *no* wrapper object, and you can instantiate [CoolNoise~] directly (or at least [CoolNoise], if ~ makes problems in julia)
gfmards IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list Email had 1 attachment:
- signature.asc 1k (application/pgp-signature)