That's useful, but up until recently you had to create a second instance of Pd from the command line anyway, since OSX would show you the instance you already had if you tried to open it from the operating system.
Or...have I missed the point? My friend and collaborator always needs two Pd's, one for Gemnotes and one for audio processing, to play my musioc...and we wrote a BASH script to launch the gemnotes one after the audio one was set up.
well, personally most times, when developing, I need to create abstractions and use global variables just to experiment with stuff. And if two instances of Pd are opened when you don't want it, it can be very annoying.
Even worst scenario when you are teaching, student might open 4 patches at a time, and as 4 Pd instances are launched, and it's a mess.
Ah yes, students.
Student: "But why can't I just double-click on the patch? It works for everything else?"
Tutor: "Because the audio driver will only work with the first instance of Pd you opened."
Student: "This software is rubbish. I hate Pd. Can we do something easier? It's too hard."
Fortunately I've just been made redundant from the institution where these words were spoken /;-/
Cheers, Ed
I always wondered whether we could have a flag in Pd GUI that set this kind of configuration. Like, "always open a new Pd instance", "always use one Pd only"... something like that. imho it would be useful.
cheers, M