That is for sure a goal. For the bare minimum, there is always Pd-vanilla.
.hc
On Feb 18, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Tuti wrote:
I just wish that PD keeps the same philosophy of robustness and simplicity as before. Tuti
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
It was already like that since the first version of pd ever, over 15 years ago. It's misleading to write it in the same paragraph as « the pd-gui side of Pd has been re-written from scratch ». You also don't state which part of the pd-gui has been rewritten from scratch, which obscures the fact that a large fraction of it hasn't been rewritten.
It's a bad idea to take credit for things that Miller had already done or that his contributors had done.
If you want to say, for example, that pd-extended 43 fixes a certain cause of hiccups due to bad sync between the two parts of pd, then you can say it like that, more or less, but a goal to keeping explanations simple doesn't entitle you to say what you have said. Le 2012-02-17 à 15:02:00, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
First off, the pd-gui side of Pd has been re-written from scratch. When you run Pd, you are actually running two programs: pd is the core engine and pd-gui is the GUI. Since basically all computers now come with multiple CPU cores, this means that pd-gui will usually run on a separate CPU core than pd, so they don’t step on each other’s toes.
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. - General Smedley Butler