I agree, this is an established aspect of patching in Pd and changing it is not likely possible at this point. A positive reinforcement for using trigger is that it's simply more readable. I also admit to using fanning when I know order isn't as important for that case,
I feel like often these problems also come from people trying Pd out after being more familiar with Max. Perhaps it would be good if Pd included a mini "Pd for Max users" guide which starts with execution order differences, ie. on canvas placement versus creation order. Forgive me if this info is in our documentation, I admit to not having gone through it since circa 2006 when I first started with Pd.
On Feb 10, 2022, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 3 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:30:36 +0100 From: Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com mailto:reduzent@gmail.com> To: pd-list@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] [midifile] Message-ID: <32c6cc64713fab78eae64728309bb95975471116.camel@gmail.com mailto:32c6cc64713fab78eae64728309bb95975471116.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 10:09 +0100, Max wrote:
Should Pd warn the user when one outlet is connected to multiple objects?
I'd rather want Pd not to do that.
There are too many cases where fanning outlet connections are OK.
I believe it's more valuable if people do not fanning connections
because they understand their implications rather than because a message tells them to avoid them.
- I'm personally not so fond of the idea of giving people patching
advice.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/