Well, if it does not break backwards compatibility of nlets, I am all for including it in pd-l2ork...
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Matt Barber brbrofsvl@gmail.com wrote:
I tried coding that once, but it seemed like it needed some big change in architecture. Technically it's only the main signal that accepts both messages and signals in this way, where you would want to route the message. Floats should almost always be promoted to signals.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
Why not simply have an inlet that can handle both inside an abstraction and route signal one way and number the other and then sprinkle that with dynamic nlet creation and you're done? Then you can simply abstract most cases.
On 2/14/2016 11:36 AM, Matt Barber wrote:
[gt~] is a great example of something that could work as an abstraction, except for the pesky right inlet which should take a signal if there's no creation argument, but float otherwise.
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
What I am also trying to do eventually in pd-l2ork is weed out redundant objects and only keep the ones that do the said task the best while still supporting other objects' idiosyncrasies (if any). There is absolutely no reason to have multiple objects of the same kind. Ultimately, one could keep all the externals in the same folder and completely do away with all the declares, imports, and other things that make learning pd unnecessarily harder.
-- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Associate Professor Computer Music ICAT Senior Fellow Director -- DISIS, L2Ork Virginia Tech School of Performing Arts – 0141 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 ico@vt.edu www.performingarts.vt.edu disis.icat.vt.edu l2ork.icat.vt.edu ico.bukvic.net On Feb 14, 2016 8:40 AM, "Fred Jan Kraan" fjkraan@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
guess some of it is in:
http://fjkraan.home.xs4all.nl/digaud/puredata/cyclone/cycloneToDo.html
This list is also becoming a list of what has been done.
As with _nettles_
"try to resurrect as independent object library"
Anyway, tell me if this gets includes on this file.
Yes, the nettles-objects are part of the latest cyclone versions. They are part of the nettles library, which can be loaded with [declare]. Not all operating systems like the '<' and '>' in the object names and there is overlap with other library objects, so only loading them when needed is cleaner.
cheers
ps. count me in for help with the help files
Great!
Greetings,
Fred Jan
2016-02-11 22:18 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com mailto:porres@gmail.com>:
Howdy, it's a known fact brazilians will start the year only after carnival, so here I am. I'd like to share my list of things to do with existing Cyclone Objetcs. Obviously there might be other issues with other objects that would make them up to date with the current version of Max(Max 7). Nonetheless, this is what I find relevant, and I've been really checking it through.
It's only about 11 objects, some has already been discussed hereand might have been fixed or in the process to be taken care of, forgive me if so.
I have it attached and also as a link to a google dochttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1L_dUNgznfhaZHPKMJ3jJ_p9uIXRVP6Rs9-3nXy2Q...
Next, I will get together a list of new objects I think should be included, many of which I've already made as abstractions (kind of to show how it works like I did with [teeth~], cause I really think they should all be done as externals). Cheers
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list