6 Jun
2002
6 Jun
'02
9:48 a.m.
hi Frank,
I seem to suffer from a terrible mail delivery delay here, so your answer has come too late -- its the same solution. I would rather use <range> -> [until] -> <a counter>, than [for++], though...
Krzysztof
Frank Barknecht wrote: ...
I'm not sure, if it's the best way, but I once did this with a fast [for++] from IEMLIB and a [tabread]. See example, where the for++ is slow.