I see... somehow I got terribly confused and thought there was a discussion to include it in vanilla, which would make sense to me. Maybe it was the conversation about meeting a "proper design" of initbang/closebang that led me to think that was on the table. Sorry for the confusion.
Well, I guess this is now turning into a request to bring such functionalities to vanilla. My point being that it'd be of vital importance if we want Pd Vanilla to have any real functionality of providing ways to program powerful external abstractions.
If not, since I do not want dependancies to other external libraries, the only way would be to "steal" it for my library, huh? What are the ethics on that?
cheers
2017-10-19 5:43 GMT-02:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at:
On 2017-10-19 06:19, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
And I ask, what came out of that? Is the jury still out?
it has been implemented exactly as miller suggested:
Pd will not include [initbang], but externals can (now) implement it. iemguts' already has an [initbang] that you can use.
fgmasdr IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list