----- "Mathieu Bouchard" matju@artengine.ca a écrit :
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, patko wrote:
Hello, we dont put accidental alterations to armature, we usually
put it
before a note, and eventually in parentheses.
Hello, I'm talking about which armature should be considered implied when trying to display a note. E.g. suppose I have an [armature] object (hypothetical class) which shows a certain number of alterations. How do I communicate that info to nearby [note] objects, which should display notes relatively to that armature ?
I'm thinking about additions, by using a dimension value for the number of notes in a scale, and a value corresponding with alteration, so G major scale would look like this [7 # 0 0 0 1 0 0 0(.
Before this the midi notes needs to be scaled, with that way it's possible to make up any scale maybe it would be better to use another class object for the scale as well.
Also you might be interested by this:
http://strasheela.sourceforge.net/strasheela/examples/Output/05-MicrotonalCh...
we see microtones indicated by signs upside the note, not in the armature, neither on the ladder, this is clean, easier to read than microtonal 'flat up' , or microtonal 'natural down' signs
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC