I'm just curious: If I implemented a way to close-source Pure Data
patches, would I violate the GPL if I ship:
- Pd as a binary
- the GPL'd externals as binary with their source code and License
- my closed-source patch
That has to be a GPL violation. On the other hand:* proprietary Pd binary* place for user to enter url of remote repository of packages* Deken exists This can't possibly be a GPL violation. I'm not advocating for building proprietary binaries, but this is such a trivial workaround it'd be silly not to mention it. -Jonathan