Zitat von zack zack@sat.qc.ca:
On my AMD dual-core 64bit (linux) running pd, recently checked out of the CVS:
It looks like tabread misses (returns 0 for) every other (odd) array value when reading the contents of an array --- UNLESS the contents
was set using tabwrite, in which case, the data is there-- as if the
reader was indexing with a 32 bit-size increment...
this is a long known issue (quite as long as there are amd64 computers out there)
however, nobody has found time yet to fix it (the fix is not trivial). if you don't want to fix it yourself but need this feature, i see only 2 possibilities: a) make a amd64 available to mr.puckette (lend him one, buy him one,...) b) fund some developer who already has an amd64 but never had the time to fix the tables.
the 2 other solutions are to run pd in 32bit mode (i never found any real speed gains in any application when running in 64bit - but of course it is cooler) OR rethink whether you really cannot do without tables for now (i have been living with pd on x86_64 for >6 month now and it seems like i never really needed the tables. but then it is just my laptop which i hardly ever use) all the best.
mfg.asdr. IOhannes