Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
Actually, for those of us who insist on vanilla and do everything with expr/expr~/fexpr~ or abstractions, is it possible to implement [z~] in fexpr~ for a delay larger than its vector size? You could do it with an abstraction using [delwrite~] and [delread~], setting the [block~] to 1, and then set the delay as a ratio to the [samplerate~] -- the difficulty in making it work correctly here is setting the size of the [delwrite~] efficiently (this could maybe be done with a loadbang routine that would send a message to a subpatch in the abstraction instance to add and connect a delwrite~ with the proper delay allocation...).
You don't need to set the block~-size to 1, and personally I would just make the delwrite~ "big enough". It's cheap to store things in a delay. But anyway, attached is a z~-clone with delwrite~/delread~ that uses a helper abstraction created dynamically.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__