3 Jun
2005
3 Jun
'05
10:23 p.m.
hi
ix@replic.net wrote:
sorry, i dont know what im talking about, i agree, taking features out
is bad, you never know who uses them. at least you can sed -i -e "s/nop/t a/" *.pd or something...
yes, but this wouldn't work with 'bang'-msgs. always check, if a [t a] or a [b] is needed is less easy than remove all [nop]s manually.
if you have a recent pd (>=0.38) , any connections to your 'nop'
object will not be disturbed, this new feature is probably why nop was dropped in the first place..
didn't notice this nice feature. thanks for pointing me to it.
cheers roman
___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de