Greetings, Thank you for your responses. I tried your suggestion, hardoff, and the result is the attached [ead-reverse~]. Unfortunately, the expression behaves differently with this [vline~]-construction as with the [phasor~]. Here, if 1 is entered into the right input of [expr~], the result is an envelope whose steepness becomes exponentially smaller while ascending and exponentially greater while descending (if near 0, the opposite form is produced and values between 1 and 0 produce a divided, confused form). I however wish to produce an envelope that becomes exponentially steeper both ascending and descending. My problem with this [expr~] as well as with Mr. Farnell's patches is that I do not quite understand the math behind them. Any ideas?
Best regards, Stephan Elliot Perez
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 5:54 PM, hard off hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
instead of the [phaser~], send a [line~] (or [vline~]) signal.
for example:
[1, 0.5 500, 0 1000 500( | [vline~]
like most of my patches, i don't think i originally made that one, someone else posted it, and i just copied. ;) must have been a long time ago though, cos i barely remember it.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Stephan Elliot Perez < dreamoftheshoreofanotherworld@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings, I wish to produce a wave form with the opposite form of the normal ead~ wave (the curves become exponentially steeper instead of flatter), which I can achieve by entering a negative number into the phasor in hard off's exact-ead~ patch, which I downloaded from the archive. However, I still want to be able to independently change the length of the ascent, decline, and distance between waves as is possible with ead~. Does anyone know how I could do this, or possibly have access to an abstraction-version of ead~?
Best regards, Stephan
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list