16 Jun
2016
16 Jun
'16
8:26 a.m.
2016-06-15 5:09 GMT-03:00 Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com:
Orm's implementation of the random phase might also be cheaper than your two fexpr~ for that part.
it's just "expr~" not "fexpr~" ;)
You might not have to be conservative with CPU usage in your case at all however.
nope, and I need to be more intuitive (as this is a didactic material) and I consider this to be "simpler" - subjective
It does work and might save cpu compared to fexpr~.
biquad~ is surely cheaper than fexpr~ !!!
In my case I am trying a textbook implementation for now.
yep, that's what I was going for in that example, what you think? If you have more remarks other than efficiency, I'd like to know.
cheers