----- "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com a écrit :
--- On Wed, 2/2/11, patko colet.patrice@free.fr wrote:
no one would be actually ridiculous by generating music with brain (Can you say that about chicken dance?).
I chose the example of the Chicken Dance exactly because it is ridiculous, so I agree with you, but fail to see the relevance.
This figure of style just make me thinking about homer simpson's brain activity always having a chicken dancing somewhere in the mind...
Also-- what do you mean by point of view? If you mean a visualization of the activity, I suppose I could also say a dancer can imagine their own Chicken Dance in kinesthetic terms, quite separate from any sound or image.
Seriously, music is easier to share with most people than galliformes choregraphy.
Tools have been developped to reproduce this music for sharing a projection around a consensus that is different following different social groups. We're just trying not to be alone.
What do you mean when you say "this music"?
This music that comes first from the mind.
Also there is not idea *behind* music, music *is* the idea.
It depends on how you define "idea behind music".
I believe matju means the process that led to music getting produced, or written, or whatever. In that case the idea is not the music.
The idea that lead someone to produce music could lead anyone to anything else, like chicken dance for example.