hehe
I've got a few questions - tried to findem in the archive - no joy :(
- is there any simple way of avoiding "multiply defined" type errors when
using arrays within an abstraction? eg. can each instance of an abstraction in a patch, have its own copy of an array named say "fred"?
or will I perhaps need to devise some tricky way of appending a unique id to the name, renaming fred "fred-id" - then letting the other objects in the abstraction know the new name of the array in case they need to access?
use it like this in an abstraction: table $1 then have your superwindow say: pd myjodelabstract blub
then it should be tabread blub and stuff except that you can conneckt tabread (+ others) directly into the table obj, so you dont need a name at all. hm, see atach patch,although maybe, the $1 subpatch feature doesnt appear to really work in 0.27 of pd? (shouldnt the table bear the name 'blub' in this case?) also , wasnt there an example in the docs for this once? (abstractions.pd?) there's only subpatch.pd but it doesnt show this feature ..
- are there any patch examples or info available outlining the concept of
"templates"?
doc/7.stuff/data-structures/* and see the 0.intro.tyxt its not shown with the *.pd filterered open box ..
uzgul.xo