Pd-list

pd-list@lists.iem.at

19 participants
33278 discussions

pd on a Mac
by Mark Danks 03 Dec '98

03 Dec '98

I don't know if we have any Macintosh hackers out there, but Paul Ossenbruggen has a very, very, very alpha version of Pd running on the Mac OS. It is slow as pond water, lots of features are missing, etc. but you can add two numbers together :-) I know that Paul hasn't had any time to work on it lately, so if anyone wants to give it a shot, let me know. I'll hook you up with Paul and the source code. Obviously, Pd/GEM should be much easier on Carbon/OS X, so you might just want to skip 8.5... Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ----------------------------------------

3 2

RE: movie player for gem
by Mark Danks 03 Dec '98

03 Dec '98

> -----Original Message----- > From: klaus voltmer [mailto:klaus@epy.farmersmanual.co.at] > Subject: movie player for gem > > have you ever tried to implement an objekt for playing movies? In the source code for GEM, there is a library for playing mpegs. Look in the AuxLibs section. However, I haven't integrated it into GEM yet, although it is on my "list of things to do". The question is when... In the short run, you need to use pix_multiimage Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ----------------------------------------

1 0

mh..
by klaus voltmer 03 Dec '98

03 Dec '98

sorry i forget to mention the URL hehe :) http://wonk.epy.co.at/ klaus On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Mark Danks wrote: > I don't know what the real numbers are either, but currently about 5 > people download GEM a day. Considering that it has been up for a couple > of years now, my guess is that a thousand people have downloaded > Pd/GEM...but I don't know how many people are actively using them. > > Also, I have always said that I would be more than willing to provide > a page for Pd/GEM resources. If any one has anything (example patches, > demos, externals, abstractions, etc), let me know and I'll create an > area for it. > > Later, Mark i published my pdlib and one gem example movie on my webserver.. (still undocumentated) this page is to provide pd and gem patches/libs/movies/sound only. i think it would be more usefull if there are many automon pages instead of only one official page... like a decentral system. but in this case there sill a need for some coordination. leder klaus

1 0

Install base and PD/GEM stuff
by Mark Danks 03 Dec '98

03 Dec '98

I don't know what the real numbers are either, but currently about 5 people download GEM a day. Considering that it has been up for a couple of years now, my guess is that a thousand people have downloaded Pd/GEM...but I don't know how many people are actively using them. Also, I have always said that I would be more than willing to provide a page for Pd/GEM resources. If any one has anything (example patches, demos, externals, abstractions, etc), let me know and I'll create an area for it. Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ---------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Guenter Geiger [mailto:guenter.geiger@psp-vie.be.philips.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 03, 1998 10:03 AM > To: 'Steev' > Cc: pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Subject: RE: minimum hardware for linux PD? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > >>>>>>>>> From: Steev [mailto:steev@detritus.net] > > btw, roughly how many pd users are there? does anyone have an idea? > > > > Hi ! > > There are 75 mailing list subscribers. > Some of them won´t do any work with pd, others who do are probably not > subscribed. > Actually I would like to see the list getting more a forum > for "pd users" than > for > "pd linux installers". > So feel free to ask any question or request which comes to > your mind during pd > usage. > Additionally if someone has some thnigs to share with others, > (externals, > patches ...) > we could set up a site for pd resources. > > Guenter > >

2 1

Re: mh..
by antiorp＠tezcat.com 03 Dec '98

03 Dec '98

>i think it would be more usefull if there are many automon pages >instead of only one official page... + !f !uzfl !t = prfrd >like a decentral system. s0l >but in this case there sill a need for some coordination. like a decentral system. - vzp sorry i forget to mention the URL mh..hehe :) > >http://wonk.epy.co.at/ >

1 0

Re[2]: minimum hardware for linux PD?
by SETA,MICHAL,MR 03 Dec '98

03 Dec '98

Hey, For those who are really curious about platforms that pd has run on: I use it in MkLinux on a PowerMac 7200/120MHz. Haven't tried yet GEM package with it but pd runs almost fine. Almost because the MkLinux system seems to have no support for MIDI :(( And no duplex audio :( I can either read or write to my dev/dsp. So I'm still working in MAX in MacOS. When I have more time I will have to recompile the kernel to tkae out sound in order to install OSS which is supposed to be running on a PPC and supposedly has full duplex audio support. Unfortunately other MkLinux users don't seem to be interested in doing music on their machines. However, given a well developed kernel and system with all support you need and considering various benchmarks, pd should perform better on a PPC processors than on Pentium. For now, though, it's just a wishful thinking. Let's hope OSX server will be more reliable. >On Wed, 2 Dec 1998, Miller Puckette wrote: > >->Hi Steev, >-> >->Did anyone answer your letter yet? (you should have a pentium; otherwise >->I don't know much about Pd on linux...) > >yes, thanx! someone said they're using a p-200 and it works fine; so far >i've tried it on an Indy and a p-100 with 24M RAM. The p-100 is pretty >sluggish (window draws and cursor movements were really slow when i had 2 >patches open at once, cos.pd and fm.pd, i think). However, it actually >never crashed whereas the Indy dumped core a few times... > >btw, roughly how many pd users are there? does anyone have an idea? > >thanx again, > >Steev Hise, Would-be World-Wide Web Wizard (WWWWW) >recycled art site: http://www.detritus.net >----------------------------------------------------------------- >"...dissatisfaction itself became a commodity as soon as economic > abundance could extend production to the processing of such raw > materials." > -Guy Debord >----------------------------------------------------------------- > > +------------> | Michal Seta | | http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1257/ | <~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| | It's only when I know what I'm doing that it's boring | j cage | +--------------------------------------------------------+

1 0

Sv: minimum hardware for linux PD?
by Soeren Bovbjerg 30 Nov '98

30 Nov '98

HI, >hi, >I'm new to PD and I'm wondering, to run it on linux what do you need >for it to work comfortably, i.e. what cpu, how much RAM ,etc. I am using an AMD K6-200 with 64 megs. PD runs very nicely compared to the Windows version on the same system (but any faster system will do nicely ;-) ) You should perhaps consider which desktop environment you will use, since they take up very different amounts of power/ram. I am using KDE which is one of the most powerhungry environments for Linux - and it still runs fine. >Also, is there a favorite soundcard? > Any full duplex card will do fine (the card should also have full duplex support Linux) Check out the sound-howto and related files for further info. I hope this helps! --- Soeren Bovbjerg

1 0

minimum hardware for linux PD?
by steev 28 Nov '98

28 Nov '98

hi, I'm new to PD and I'm wondering, to run it on linux what do you need for it to work comfortably, i.e. what cpu, how much RAM ,etc. Also, is there a favorite soundcard? And: is there a PD FAQ? thanx very much, steev hise decoy(a)tired.com

2 1

FW: problems with markex installation
by Guenter Geiger 25 Nov '98

25 Nov '98

-----Original Message----- From: Jan T. [mailto:falkenst@fossi.uni-weimar.de] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 5:42 PM To: pd-list-request(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at Subject: problems with markex installation hi i was trying to install the externels for pd. the problem is: i dont have any experience in c. i can compile the files to *.o, but i dont know how to build the objects or to handle the makefile. is there maby a compiled version for windows? please help me installing the externals. thanks you jan http://www.uni-weimar.de/~falkenst/

1 0

markEx compile
by Mark Danks 25 Nov '98

25 Nov '98

There is a version of MarkEx for windows and Irix on my web site. Go to http://www.danks.org/mark and look for the MarkEx section. On windows, both GEM and MarkEx are compiled with MS VC++ 5.0, so there isn't a makefile for Windoze, only Irix and Linux. Miller and I always try to provide a compiled version of our apps, and of course there is the source code. Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ---------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Jan T. [mailto:falkenst@fossi.uni-weimar.de] Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 5:42 PM To: pd-list-request(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at Subject: problems with markex installation hi i was trying to install the externels for pd. the problem is: i dont have any experience in c. i can compile the files to *.o, but i dont know how to build the objects or to handle the makefile. is there maby a compiled version for windows? please help me installing the externals. thanks you jan http://www.uni-weimar.de/~falkenst/

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list