Pd-list

pd-list@lists.iem.at

19 participants
33278 discussions

Sv: resynching audio error
by Søren Bovbjerg 01 Sep '99

01 Sep '99

HI >I just re-installed PD 0.25 under W98 and keep getting a "resynching audio" >error. Running a P333 with SB Live sound card. What should I be doing? First, keep in mind, that PD is designed to run under Windows NT. However it will also work under win95/98. I have a similar soundcard and get the same error under 98. However it helps a lot to disable either DAC or ADC (pd -nodac / - noadc), but I do not consider that a satisfying solution. I don't think that PD is the problem, but rather the Live drivers. It is too bad, because it is a great soundcard for other purposes. By the way, running PD in linux with the Live drivers crashes the soundmodule and keeps PD hanging as a zombie. Running as root crashes the OS (!). Beware! I have reported the problem to Creative. Cheers Soeren

1 0

resynching audio error
by Elliot Anderson 01 Sep '99

01 Sep '99

I just re-installed PD 0.25 under W98 and keep getting a "resynching audio" error. Running a P333 with SB Live sound card. What should I be doing? Best, Elliot Anderson Elliot Anderson Lecturer, Electronic Media, Art Department University of California, Santa Cruz http://www.sirius.com/~ewanders

1 0

netsend/netreceive
by Miller Puckette 01 Sep '99

01 Sep '99

By the way, it occurrs to me that "netsend" is a gaping security hole; anyone who knows your port number could send Pd commands to read and write files on your system. I'm trying to think of a way to restrict what a netreceive can do but in the meantime, perhaps you shouldn't tell the world what port numbers your patches use, or run anyone else's patch without changing the port number. And don't leave the help window open... cheers Miller

2 1

RE: GUI
by Iain.Mott＠cmis.CSIRO.AU 01 Sep '99

01 Sep '99

>Miller, you forgot to say that PD is *open-source*, while MAX/MSP is >not. *And* that PD is free, while MAX/MSP costs money. *And* that >MAX/MSP does not have netsend/netreceive, AFAIK... there are Max udp send and receive objects available at: http://cnmat.cnmat.berkeley.edu/OSC/clients/max-objs.html is anything similar available for jmax? cheers, -- Iain Mott iain.mott(a)cmis.csiro.au http://members.tripod.com/soundart

1 0

Re: GUI
by Miller Puckette 31 Aug '99

31 Aug '99

Hi Christian, The main points Pd would have over Max/MSP are GEM (the graphics library by Mark Danks), better frequency-domain processing, and (potentially) more flexible data handling; the main advantage of Max/MSP is that it's more polished and much better documented. cheers Miller

3 2

Re: GUI
by integer＠www.god-emil.dk 31 Aug '99

31 Aug '99

>The main points Pd would have over Max/MSP are GEM (the graphics library >by Mark Danks), u!ch nato.0+55+3d = offzetz 2 1 zrtrn ecztent sansz !ntel SS kasch data >better frequency-domain processing, and (potentially) more >flexible data handling; the main advantage of Max/MSP is that it's more >polished and much better documented. due 2 msp = baszd on pd +? zttz

1 0

Compiling pd with SGI -n32 7.3 compilers
by Michael A. Thompson 31 Aug '99

31 Aug '99

Hi, I just got my hands on an R5000 Indy with the 7.3 compilers on it here at UNT. I have been trying for 3 days to get pd compiled n32 with these compilers. I can compile fine with egcs compilers n32... but my problem is this. I dont get any serious error on the compilation but when I run the pd-n32 binary I get this tcltk error: Application initialization failed: invalid command name "tcl_findLibrary". here is what I have tried. 1. compiling only the pd part of the program. pd-gui is still -o32. doesnt work. pd-gui will not display the patches nor recognize the patch connections. some thing to do with the -o32 -n32 drawing to the tcltk canvas I think... I dont know... 2. replaced the libtk and libtcl with -n32 versions and compiled the whole package -n32. It worked 1 time then nothing else. Here are my compiler and linker flags.... I want an optimized version for the O2. a. -n32 -DN32 -woff 1080,1064,1185 -IPA -Ofast=ip32_5k -OPT:cray_ivdep=true -r5000 -OPT:roundoff=3 -OPT:IEEE_arithmetic=3. Im using -Ofast=ip32_5k because I plan on running this on an O2... but if I change it to -Ofast=ip22_5k (for the indy) same thing happens. b. I tried this as well: -n32 -DN32 -woff 1080,1064,1185 -IPA -O2 c. -n32 -O2 d. -n32 -O3 same message. tcl_findLibrary is called from the libtk8.0.a library... So, Any Ideas? Thanks, Michael -- ---------------------------------- Michael A. Thompson [IRIX - NeXTStep - Linux - MacOS - Windows] Home: (940)382-2086 E-Mail: mat0001(a)jove.acs.unt.edu ----------------------------------

1 0

Re: Compiling pd with SGI -n32 7.3 compilers
by Miller Puckette 31 Aug '99

31 Aug '99

Damn, I should have spoken up earlier, sorry... I found out how to get Pd (n32) and pd-goi (o32) running together. The problem in version 0.26 is an un-profiled call to atof() in m_binbuf.c. (The makefile should have complained abouit that but I got the C flags wrong!) The fix is to change #ifdef N32 #include <malloc.h> #else #include <stdlib.h> #endif to #include <stdlib.h> I don't remember why I put the #ifdefs in in the first place... cheers Miller

1 0

GUI
by godpup＠ix.netcom.com 30 Aug '99

30 Aug '99

pure data people... quick question for all the pd fanatics. been reading all the posts (hence the purpose of subscribing to the list..) and i've got a question regarding this program. finally got my G3 (makes a very nice doorstop for the time being...) and i'm more or less interested in mangling sound via dsp. max/msp and supercollider seem to be kick ass programs, but i'm wondering what functions pd can perform that other software doesn't / can't. i'm guessing that a lot of people on this list either write or mod computer code and find the 'rawness' of pd appealing. very curious since i'm not planning on running linux on my G3, but... there's always the possibiltiy. just trying to find inexpensive ways to write my own dsp software / objects along with some music noodling without putting myself in more poverty. (college costs just gave me a swift kick in the ass...) i'm mediocre at C, so please take that into consideration. sorry to those of you who find this message completely useless. i will contribute in one way or another at some point in time. oh yeah, how many people are 'composing' without the use of any MIDI interface? (i.e. mouse clicking instead of using a keyboard / synth / sampler...) thinking about ditching my asr-10 for financial reasons. (although i love the machine) |get|put|make| cheers, christian

1 0

Re: gem 0.81
by integer＠www.god-emil.dk 30 Aug '99

30 Aug '99

>No... was me!nzt du `No...` svp +? > >On Mon, 32 Aug 1999, 83.zxbxb_>XtrX.106.74 wrote: > >> isnt sgi abandoning irix anyhow in favor of nt + linux? >> --

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list