I'm not quite sure I understand your patching approach enough to debug.
If it's at all helpful, I can suggest how I might do this via [clone -n 1] with 72 instances of an abstraction:
[inlet]
|
[route freq gain]
|
[osc]
|
[*~ 0.25] <-- perhaps some trim amount as lots of osc are being summer
|
[*~ ] <--- single osc gain value goes here
|
[outlet~]
The outlets are summed in clone through the output. If you need stereo, it's the same just with two [outlet~]s and some sort of panner.
UDP messages would then just need to have the gain values read and applied to the clone instances by their ID, ie.
[1 gain 0.25
|
[clone 72 -n 1 orc-abs]
|
[*~ ] <--- master gain
|
[dac~] <-- or some similar output abstraction
Not knowing your networking message layout, I can't say anything else other than "use OSC" as addressing and arguments are relatively easy to work with via:
[netreceive -u -b]
|
[oscparse]
|
perhaps some routing etc
|
[clone]
> On Mar 14, 2021, at 3:31 AM, pd-list-request(a)lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 03:31:23 +0100
> From: Michael Karr <michael.karr.22(a)gmail.com <mailto:michael.karr.22@gmail.com>>
> To: pd-list(a)lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>
> Subject: [PD] Adding up a thicket of oscillators
> Message-ID:
> <CAOH2gpZ=GUkk4X_kMOku3HeoCc92_xS-GgVTA0iRDWpTTHDQdw(a)mail.gmail.com <mailto:CAOH2gpZ=GUkk4X_kMOku3HeoCc92_xS-GgVTA0iRDWpTTHDQdw@mail.gmail.com>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello!
>
> I am working on a multichannel sound piece, with 72 oscillators, receiving
> data from ffmpeg over udp. Each oscillator stream has its own intensity
> fluctuations. However, when I try to add the dynamic parts and scale them
> collectively (using *~ and a very tender slider), I get no output, whereas
> adding up the raw oscillators does produce audio, minus the individual
> fluctuations.
>
> 1) how do I combine all of these dynamic signals?
> 2) how can I make else/count start counting the moment information starts
> flowing through the udp port, and stop again once the feed stops, while
> keeping the connection active?
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Michael