Pd-list September 2009

pd-list@lists.iem.at

137 participants
191 discussions

Re: [PD] Percolate
by rene beekman 29 Sep '09

29 Sep '09

I stand corrected :) Mark, thanks! This is great! Now, if someone could also point me to a Windoze version of Percolate for Pd, I'd be totally happy :) Rene BTW Mark, have you thought about dropping the Percolate developers a note to ask them to update their links? On Sep 26, 2009, at 18:12, pd-list-request(a)iem.at wrote: > Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:29:53 -0700 (PDT) > From: mark edward grimm <mgrimm(a)syr.edu> > Subject: Re: [PD] Percolate > To: pd-list(a)iem.at > Message-ID: <358216.94182.qm(a)web32407.mail.mud.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > >> So it seems that right now you have two options; find a way >> to do your project without the Percolate objects, or move to >> Max/MSP ... > > um... thats not true. i compiled the source a while ago. heres a > binary. works on 10.5 and 10.6 if on osx: > > http://megrimm.net/software/PeRColate-OSX-Intel-10.5/PeRColate-OSX-Intel-10… > > i have the sources + xcode project somewhere I think... i would have > to look around... > > mark

8 15

Re: [PD] how to cite the Pure Data in a research paper
by Mathieu Bouchard 29 Sep '09

29 Sep '09

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, Nicolas Montgermont wrote: > You can have a look at this thread for example: > http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-01/059095.html Ah, so is this about which spellings of Pd are the most orthodox? There's a reason why I spread the spelling "PureData" all over the place. The double uppercase makes it readable as two words, but the lack of space makes it look like one distinctive word and not like a common adjective followed by a very common name. I spread that spelling all over the place. "Pd" is too short except when you need a shorthand that is that short. It's a very common and equivocal two-letter combination (out of only 676) and it's useful for making silly jokes in french. _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801

4 6

Re: [PD] Percolate
by Ed Kelly 29 Sep '09

29 Sep '09

Hey Jose, and greetings from London to all... Here's what I've got. Windoze, the CCRMA source RPM and my linux version. There is a Windows version too, but it's old. I don't know if it's the newest one Olaf Matthes made but... In PD_Extended? Yes please, but I never got bamboo~ to work or any other PHiSM objects (they are really useful in Csound). mandolin~ however is a gem (but not GEM)... Oh yeah, and you could also use the CsoundAPI object to run them in Csound in PD. ciao Ed Metastudio 3 for Pure Data - Free download at: http://sharktracks.co.uk/puredata --- On Thu, 24/9/09, Jose Luis Santorcuato <santorcuato76(a)gmail.com> wrote: > From: Jose Luis Santorcuato <santorcuato76(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [PD] Percolate > To: "PD List" <pd-list(a)iem.at> > Date: Thursday, 24 September, 2009, 11:18 PM > Dear friends, well i am working with music > and arduino and i need the old library percolate... with > objects like a bamboo~, marimba~ etc... > Can yours help me... > > Thanks a lot > > José > > -- > > http://www.chilemigra.cl > http://arselectronicachile.blogspot.com > http://www.myspace.com/santorcuato > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list(a)iem.at > mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > Metastudio 3 for Pure Data - Free download at: http://sharktracks.co.uk/puredata

1 0

Re: [PD] Percolate
by Ed Kelly 29 Sep '09

29 Sep '09

Here's what I've got. Windoze, the CCRMA source RPM and my linux version. There is a Windows version too, but it's old. I don't know if it's the newest one Olaf Matthes made but... In PD_Extended? Yes please, but I never got bamboo~ to work or any other PHiSM objects (they are really useful in Csound). mandolin~ however is a gem (but not GEM)... Oh yeah, and you could also use the CsoundAPI object to run them in Csound in PD. ciao Ed Metastudio 3 for Pure Data - Free download at: http://sharktracks.co.uk/puredata --- On Thu, 24/9/09, Jose Luis Santorcuato <santorcuato76(a)gmail.com> wrote: > From: Jose Luis Santorcuato <santorcuato76(a)gmail.com> > Subject: [PD] Percolate > To: "PD List" <pd-list@iem..at> > Date: Thursday, 24 September, 2009, 11:18 PM > Dear friends, well i am working with music > and arduino and i need the old library percolate... with > objects like a bamboo~, marimba~ etc... > Can yours help me... > > Thanks a lot > > José > > -- > > http://www.chilemigra.cl > http://arselectronicachile.blogspot.com > http://www.myspace.com/santorcuato > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > Pd-list(a)iem.at > mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >

1 0

Stochastic rhythms in pd
by Jerome Covington 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Has anyone done any work with percussive elements in pd, other than more traditional drum machine, looping applications? Something that generates seemingly random, preferably sparse rhythmic elements based, or not, on some minimal user input? Are there any patches that anyone would like to share? -- Regards, Jerome Covington . . . . : . . . . : "define audio development"

6 7

[writesf~] in -batch and -nogui modes
by Roman Haefeli 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

hi all i had encountered some issues with the object class [writesf~] in the modes -batch and -nogui. i was told by dmotd in #dataflow this might be related to setting the samplerate for certain samplerate dependent object is not happening at the correct time in -nogui mode. i found two work workarounds to overcome this (basically they do the same): * sending a message to the patch using the -send flag: -send "pd dsp 1" * using [loadbang]-[delay 1]-[dsp 1(-[s pd] instead of using a plain [loadbang] for turning dsp on. now it seems, that this doesn't work in -batch mode, since the [delay] triggers the 'dsp on' only logically delayed, but not effectively (this is at least my interpretation of what is going on). it also seems, that [writesf~] wants the 'dsp 1' message to come not only logically later, but _really_ later. otherwise it creates just an empty file with 0 byte size (the resulting soundfile doesn't even contain the heaser). i figured out, that using -send "pd dsp 1" helps, and finally enables [writesf~] to write correct soundfiles in -batch mode. also i noticed, that messages to [writesf~] need to be sent _after_ turning dsp on. which means, that you have to use a [delay 0] when wanting to start [writesf~] on loadbang. Before writing a bug report, i would like to discuss the issue here in order to not write some bogus bug report: * is my interpretation of things correct? * what other object classes might be affected as well, if any? is there some easier way to make a patch work in -batch mode than having to edit it and put a [delay 0] after every [loadbang]? for testing purposes i attached a test patch. cheerio roman

1 0

PD users in Beirut?
by Alexandre Castonguay 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone on the list was from Beirut. I would like to and see what people are up to. maa assalamäh a

1 0

Variable length recording
by Andrew Faraday 28 Sep '09

28 Sep '09

Hey Guys I'm trying to record to a table between two given points (e.g. note on and note off at a given pitch) so that an array will resize the length of time between those points. So far I can only set the array size in advance and then record(using [tabwrite~]) from a given point. Any ideas how I'd record like that? God Bless Andrew _________________________________________________________________ With Windows Live, you can organise, edit, and share your photos. http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/

3 2

vanilla, extended, svn and x86_64
by Pierre 27 Sep '09

27 Sep '09

Hi all, until now I have been using a 32bit system, but 2 days ago I installed a brand new ubuntu '9.10' 64 bit. (And I want to keep it, this '9.10' 64 bit seems to me faster than '8.04' 32 bit) As Pd-extended for x86_64 is not auto-builded, I have some questions about building a debian package : - is there a document describing the SVN directory structure ? - what are the differences between 'pd-extended' and 'pd-vanilla loading all externals' ? - what is the simpliest way to build pd-extended (a kind of 'nightly build @ home') to produce a beautiful .deb package for x86_64 - what is the simpliest way to build pd-'extended'-gui-rewrite for x86_64 - is there a simple way to have and manage differents pd (vanilla, extended, gui-rewrite) with differents versions on the same computer ? Some informations about what I would like to do : - in fact I think I dont really need the whole pd-extended thing as I often only use Gem with few (5, 6) others externals... - but it can be very nice to try and be able to use ANY of the external included in the svn (I'm always in a learning process) - I would like to use the latest sources, nightly build was just fine for me on 32bit - but I also need to have a method to build a stable pd-extended release if the latests sources give me pd crashes (I do Audio/Video live shows and performance and stability are very important on scene...) voila! any suggestion is welcome best regards, pierre

7 15

Printing to Windows command prompt
by Jamie Bullock 27 Sep '09

27 Sep '09

Hi all, Is it possible to prevent Pd from 'detaching' itself from the command prompt when launched from the command line under Windows? It is very useful for debugging externals to be able to printf() things to the command line, but don't seem to be able to do this under XP. I'm not a Windows user, so maybe I'm just missing something obvious. TIA, Jamie -- http://www.jamiebullock.com

3 4

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
20
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list September 2009