sorry, i cannot catch what your problem is
the outlet~ of the 256-window produces a stream. one 256-sample vector
covers 5,8 ms (at 44,1 kHz). and the 64-window gets that stream and handles
it in 4 parts (each 64 samples, each 1.45 ms). there is no loop at all.
in each (block)window there is a kind of "trigger-point" until then all
calculations of a vector have to be done. and at that point the result is
copied to what ever (eg. the soundcard). in a 64 block this is done all 1,45
ms (depending on the samplerate). a larger blocksize has less of those
"trigger-points" and does calculations on larger data. - at least thatŽs how
I understand the whole thing.
sme.
----- Original Message -----
From: "J. Scott Hildebrand" <jshildebrand(a)ucdavis.edu>
To: "marius schebella" <marius.schebella(a)chello.at>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] outputting samples
>
> ok i see what you're saying, but this is only converting block
> sizes. would it just take 64 samples and send that, and then send the next
> 64 a couple more times? how do the samples actually get to the soundcard?
>
> scott
>
>
>
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, marius schebella wrote:
>
> > do this: have the block~ 256 in a subpatch and in this subpatch there
should
> > be a outlet~ object to which you can connect the signal-stream. the
outlet
> > on the objectbox of your subpatch should then have a connection to a
dac~
> > object. (the parent patch has the (default) 64-sample-vector-size).
outlet~s
> > and inlet~s is the best way of converting between different blocksizes.
> > sme.
> >
> > > > > i now know that the output array is hardcoded to 64
blocksize. if
> > i
> > > > > have an array of 256 inside my perform function, how do i create a
> > loop to
> > > > > output the whole thing? i guess a better question would be; is the
> > output
> > > > > finally sent to the soundcard when there is a whole pass through
the
> > > > > entire external, or when leaving the perform function? thanks!
> > > > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "640K ought to be enough for anybody." -- Bill Gates, 1981
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>