Pd-list February 2000

pd-list@lists.iem.at

28 participants
26 discussions

\/\ das re zul tat b!tte. das rezul tat
by integer＠www.god-emil.dk 12 Feb '00

12 Feb '00

- data http://m9ndfukc.com/nato.0+55.modular.00/ http://m9ndfukc.com/nato.0+55.modular.02/ - akompan!ament http://www.m9ndfukc.org/data/noisz/male.fasc!zm.macht.ganz.gluckl!ch+fr3!.m… | |9| [p-un_kT-pr_o-Tk_oL] Ø f Ø Ø Ø 3 | herausgegeben vøm !nternat!onalen !nst!tut f:ur ordnung |+| d!sz!pl!n : / / m9ndfukc.com e | | +---------- | | \\----------------+ | | e

1 0

net experiment
by Timmy B 11 Feb '00

11 Feb '00

Hi Kids, I would appreciate some people helping with a little pd net experiment - all you would have to do is run alittle patch with a netsend / netreceive pair in it, doing a pd ping thing. of course more interaction - online performative stuff saturday evening (adelaide, australia time) is happening and there may be wierdnesses to mix with.. soon tm -- -------- ------------------------------------ \ / Tim Boykett mailto:tim@timesup.org \ / TIME'S UP \/ Industriezeile 33 B /\ A-4020 Linz /xx\ ph/fax:+43/732-787804 /xxxx\ http://www.timesup.org -------- ------------------------------------ Watchout: http://gegenschwarzblau.cjb.net/

1 0

linux compile probs
by Timmy B 04 Feb '00

04 Feb '00

Hi Kids, perhaps I am behind the times, a 0.26 release. But I wanted to look at the error messages in the (non-functioning) midi startup routines, so I started a recompile with some debug messages. haha very strange holiday activities i hear you say so now it doesn't start anymore, it seems that the call to pd-gui is crashing (calling pd-gui direct segfaults) and the pd process is waiting around for it forever. starting pd-gui with some error message fprintfs tells me that Tk_Main is being called but not calling Tcl_AppInit before the segfault. if it helps, gdb tells me it dies in TclSetupEnv, which doesnt have any man pages on my machine (so probably none). I am on a RH 5.2 heavily updated to 6.0 and 6.1, tcl/tk 8.0.2, XFree 3.3.3.1-49, mostly pretty standard stuff. i have now installed 0.29, it runs no problem, but I will probably need to investigate the midi problems, and recompile with my own adaptions. thus I would appreciate ideas on what might not work. any ideas? what might I have forgotten? please tell! cheers all, tim -- -------- ------------------------------------ \ / Tim Boykett mailto:tim@timesup.org \ / TIME'S UP \/ Industriezeile 33 B /\ A-4020 Linz /xx\ ph/fax:+43/732-787804 /xxxx\ http://www.timesup.org -------- ------------------------------------ ! Help B92 and the independent media in Yugoslavia: http://helpB92.xs4all.nl !

2 1

gem 0.82 is out!
by Mark Danks 04 Feb '00

04 Feb '00

Gem 0.82 is out for Windows. I'm sure that the Linux version will be along shortly (Thank you, Guenter, as always!) I still haven't had anyone take over the SGI version, so it is still at 0.79. I'm willing to mirror it, but I can't compile it. The changes are: - stereoscopic rendering - a primitive triangle object - the particles objects are now frame rate independent - new particle objects - more help files - bug fixes Make sure to read the release notes in the doc directory for a complete update. I'm feeling inspired to do some more documentation, especially with the particle objects, so there may be another point release in a couple of weeks. As always, changes, bugs, requests, etc. are appreciated. You can get it at the usual place: http://www.danks.org/mark/GEM/ Later, Mark ============================ = mdanks(a)stormfront.com = http://www.danks.org/mark ============================

2 1

RE: question: should toys be part of Pd distribution?
by Mark Danks 03 Feb '00

03 Feb '00

Assuming that new releases get folded in quickly, this sounds good to me. Miller and I deliberately kept Pd and GEM separate, although it always causes confusion to new users. This solves two of the big problems: making sure that the individual packages are always available and the time commitment on the authors' parts to deal with it. Later, Mark ============================ = mdanks(a)stormfront.com = http://www.danks.org/mark ============================ > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl MacMillan [mailto:karlmac@peabody.jhu.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 5:22 PM > To: msp(a)ucsd.edu > Cc: pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Subject: Re: question: should toys be part of Pd distribution? > > > Well, from the response to this so far and from talking to my > colleagues > that are interested in PD but still haven't taken the plunge, it seems > that nice integrated, ready to go binaries with all the > goodies would be > welcomed. Perhaps what is needed is someone to compile all this stuff > for all the platforms into, to use the linux jargon, > distributions. As > I have access to linux and windows with compilers and should > have access > to an O2 soon (and have the time), I would be happy to do > this if people > are interested. This way the individual packages can continue to be > mantained by their authors and released according to their own > schedules, but end users can get everything they want. Let me know. > > Karl > > Miller Puckette wrote: > > > > Hi Pd-ers, > > > > would it be more convenient for you if I integrated "toys" > (the pitch > > tracker, expr, and other really useful things) as part of the Pd > > distribution? It would make the distribution grow by 150K or so... > > > > I'm raising the question because I'm writing a phase object > for sampling > > (which someone suggested here a year or so ago) and want to > put something > > in "soundfile-tools" in the pd distribution which uses the > new object... > > it seems as if that would be a good reason to put "toys" in > the distribution > > of Pd... > > > > cheers > > Miller > > -- > _____________________________________________________ > | Karl W. MacMillan | > | Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University | > | Network and Telecommunications Services | > | karlmac(a)peabody.jhu.edu | > | 410/659-8297 | > ----------------------------------------------------- >

1 0

RE: question: should toys be part of Pd distribution?
by Mark Danks 02 Feb '00

02 Feb '00

With the larger distributions (like GEM), it makes sense to keep them seperate. In general, I think that the less downloading of packages that people need to do, the better. Also, what are the chances that Guenter's slider, bang, and toggle objects could be integrated? Later, Mark ============================ = mdanks(a)stormfront.com = http://www.danks.org/mark ============================ > -----Original Message----- > From: Miller Puckette [mailto:mpuckett@man104-1.UCSD.Edu] > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 9:21 PM > To: pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Subject: question: should toys be part of Pd distribution? > > > Hi Pd-ers, > > would it be more convenient for you if I integrated "toys" (the pitch > tracker, expr, and other really useful things) as part of the Pd > distribution? It would make the distribution grow by 150K or so... > > I'm raising the question because I'm writing a phase object > for sampling > (which someone suggested here a year or so ago) and want to > put something > in "soundfile-tools" in the pd distribution which uses the > new object... > it seems as if that would be a good reason to put "toys" in > the distribution > of Pd... > > cheers > Miller >

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list February 2000