Pd-list March 1999

pd-list@lists.iem.at

18 participants
32 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Re: experimental: communication to pd via java
by antiorp＠tezcat.com 24 Mar '99

24 Mar '99

>hello, > >i have written a small java app that communicates to pd http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/tn1157.html

1 0

experimental: communication to pd via java
by Norbert Math 24 Mar '99

24 Mar '99

hello, i have written a small java app that communicates to pd over the net. You can see it at http://elmupc01.mhsg.ac.at/pdremote The code is at http://elmupc01.ac.at/pdremote/pdremote.tar (Sorry win-users: tar only, but winzip can handle it) Maybe somebody finds it useful. There is still much to do, e.g. make a nicer graphical interface. My intention is to make a webcast station which can be controlled by the users. I would like to be able to send mp3 audio streams from pd. Does anybody know about an mp3 encoder/decoder external ? norbert

1 0

RE: camera object in pd-gem
by Mark Danks 24 Mar '99

24 Mar '99

> -----Original Message----- > From: Gilbert Nouno [mailto:Gilbert.Nouno@ircam.fr] > Subject: camera object in pd-gem > > I am a new pd and gem user, so I would like to apologize for my basic > questions. > Don't worry. I would blame the documentation in GEM, instead of your questions. <snip> > I tried to use the camera object, but I did'nt manage to get it work. > the doc says it is still in development, does it work and how > do you include it in a gem chain ? > I was actually looking at the camera code last night. It works on my box, but it isn't very intuitive. This should be cleaned up with GEM 0.80 and I'll have some example patches. Let me know if you need it before then. <snip> > is it possible to have local referentials and to move one referential > inside another one ? > in fact I would like to do a composition of movments. > Absolutely. You can have as many translate and rotate objects as you want in a chain. Try the following patch (make sure to set the drawing to line, so that you can see the rotation of the sphere). Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ---------------------------------------- #N canvas 682 356 600 500 8; #X obj 59 149 gemwin; #X obj 271 56 gemhead; #X obj 276 113 rotate 0 1 0; #X obj 272 217 rotate 1 0 0; #X obj 272 271 sphere; #X msg 376 231 draw line; #X msg 113 59 create; #X msg 123 97 destroy; #X msg 174 57 1; #X msg 184 95 0; #X floatatom 384 65; #X floatatom 413 166; #X obj 274 167 translateXYZ 2 0 0; #X connect 1 0 2 0; #X connect 2 0 12 0; #X connect 3 0 4 0; #X connect 5 0 4 0; #X connect 6 0 0 0; #X connect 7 0 0 0; #X connect 8 0 0 0; #X connect 9 0 0 0; #X connect 10 0 2 1; #X connect 11 0 3 1; #X connect 12 0 3 0;

1 0

camera object in pd-gem
by Gilbert Nouno 24 Mar '99

24 Mar '99

Hi all, I am a new pd and gem user, so I would like to apologize for my basic questions. I run pd on SGI Indy (6.2) and Octane (6.5) machines. I'd like to use gem, I'vetried a few examples and I must say the result is impressive ! I tried to use the camera object, but I did'nt manage to get it work. the doc says it is still in development, does it work and how do you include it in a gem chain ? As I am still a novice, I have just manage to map textures on spheres, and have the sphere rotate, but how can I have the sphere rotate on its own axis, and also on an external axis (like planets). is it possible to have local referentials and to move one referential inside another one ? in fact I would like to do a composition of movments. Thanks for your help. Gilbert Nouno

1 0

new particle examples
by Mark Danks 23 Mar '99

23 Mar '99

There are some new particle example patches up on my web site. They do not have a direct link, but will be in GEM 0.80. go to: http://www.danks.org/mark/GEM/partEx.tar or http://www.danks.org/mark/GEM/partEx.zip The tar file is 20k, the zip is 4k. Take your pick. Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ---------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Guenter Geiger [mailto:guenter.geiger@psp-vie.be.philips.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 1999 12:10 AM > To: 'Mark Danks'; pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Subject: RE: gem 0.79 for Linux > > > Well, I tried it twice on an SGI. The first time it worked, > the second time it > didn´t, but it could have been some "operating mistake". > > Well, given a little bit of time I can at least get familiar > with the code > here at work with my NT station :) > > .. and hopefully get it running on linux soon ... > > Guenter > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Danks [mailto:mdanks@Stormfront.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 5:28 PM > > To: Guenter Geiger; pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > > Subject: RE: gem 0.79 for Linux > > > > > > I might have forgotten to get rid of an old test patch. Make sure > > that you are running gem_particle/gem1.simple.pd The objects > > "particle", "partatom", and "partfount" should have gone > away (and if > > they didn't, they will in gem0.80) > > > > I have never been able to test the particle stuff on an > SGI or Linux > > box. All that I know is that GEM starts up on an SGI box...I > > don't have > > physical access to one. I haven't had time to get my Linux > box up at > > home yet either, which will make things alot better. > > > > I can come up with a few more example patches and blast > > them to you... > > > > Later, Mark > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > -- Mark Danks > > -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com > > -- http://www.danks.org/mark > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Guenter Geiger [mailto:guenter.geiger@psp-vie.be.philips.com] > > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 5:40 AM > > To: pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > > Subject: gem 0.79 for Linux > > > > > > > > Hi again ! > > > > No, unfortunately this is not a release announcment, but > > rather a question for > > Mark. > > I have compiled and built gem-0.79 on linux and folded in the > > changes for the > > gemmouse > > object under Linux (and SGI). > > > > The only problem I have with 0.79 is, that the particle test > > patch is not > > working. > > Now, I don´t have any idea of the API or something else of > > the particle system. > > > > Do you have other patches which test the particle system ? > > BTW. the test program provided by the particle library works .... > > > > Guenter > > > > >

1 0

pd-documentation
by Christian Feldbauer 23 Mar '99

23 Mar '99

Hi !! IÅ½d like to write documentation for pd (objects or pd itself). What does already exist ?? WhatÅ½s still to be made ?? Help-Patches ?? Ciao Feldi

3 2

GEM examples
by Mark Danks 23 Mar '99

23 Mar '99

I am always happy to link to anyone who has used Pd and GEM. Just let me know. I'm also on the lookout for good example patches. With my pieces, I haven't made the pd/GEM patches avaliable because they usually require a very specific hardware setup (and a lot of operator interaction). If anyone just "downloaded" my pieces, they would probably just become very frustrated and not see anything. Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ---------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Guirreri [mailto:cguirrer@runet.edu] > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 8:21 AM > To: pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Subject: Waveout > <snip> > > Also, I was pleased to see some of the examples at the GEM > webpage. Just > wondering if anyone is holding an archive of performances and > works for > download as examples of pd's power.

2 1

RE: gem 0.79 for Linux
by Mark Danks 23 Mar '99

23 Mar '99

I might have forgotten to get rid of an old test patch. Make sure that you are running gem_particle/gem1.simple.pd The objects "particle", "partatom", and "partfount" should have gone away (and if they didn't, they will in gem0.80) I have never been able to test the particle stuff on an SGI or Linux box. All that I know is that GEM starts up on an SGI box...I don't have physical access to one. I haven't had time to get my Linux box up at home yet either, which will make things alot better. I can come up with a few more example patches and blast them to you... Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ---------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Guenter Geiger [mailto:guenter.geiger@psp-vie.be.philips.com] > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 5:40 AM > To: pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Subject: gem 0.79 for Linux > > > > Hi again ! > > No, unfortunately this is not a release announcment, but > rather a question for > Mark. > I have compiled and built gem-0.79 on linux and folded in the > changes for the > gemmouse > object under Linux (and SGI). > > The only problem I have with 0.79 is, that the particle test > patch is not > working. > Now, I don´t have any idea of the API or something else of > the particle system. > > Do you have other patches which test the particle system ? > BTW. the test program provided by the particle library works .... > > Guenter > >

2 1

RE: Where are the executables ??
by Mark Danks 22 Mar '99

22 Mar '99

You probably want to get them from Miller's page at: http://man104nfs.ucsd.edu/~mpuckett/software.html Later, Mark ---------------------------------------- -- Mark Danks -- mdanks(a)stormfront.com -- http://www.danks.org/mark ---------------------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Feldbauer [mailto:feldi@sbox.tu-graz.ac.at] > Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 1:25 PM > To: pd-list(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Subject: Where are the executables ?? > > > Hi !! > > I´ve just downloaded > ftp://iem.mhsg.ac.at/pd/WIN/pd-0.25TEST3.tar.Z > and tried to unzip it. > But there aren´t any executables in the directory pd\bin !!!! > > What have I done wrong ? Doesn´t this zipfile contain a fully compiled > version for Windows ? > > Ciao > Feldi > ------------------------------------------------- > > Christian Feldbauer > Tel: 0316 825083 > Email 1: feldi(a)sbox.tu-graz.ac.at > Email 2: feldbauer(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at > Home: http://www.sbox.tu-graz.ac.at/home/f/feldi/ > >

1 0

Where are the executables ??
by Christian Feldbauer 22 Mar '99

22 Mar '99

Hi !! IÅ½ve just downloaded ftp://iem.mhsg.ac.at/pd/WIN/pd-0.25TEST3.tar.Z and tried to unzip it. But there arenÅ½t any executables in the directory pd\bin !!!! What have I done wrong ? DoesnÅ½t this zipfile contain a fully compiled version for Windows ? Ciao Feldi ------------------------------------------------- Christian Feldbauer Tel: 0316 825083 Email 1: feldi(a)sbox.tu-graz.ac.at Email 2: feldbauer(a)iem.mhsg.ac.at Home: http://www.sbox.tu-graz.ac.at/home/f/feldi/

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list March 1999