Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.
On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote:
(Sending again, in thread)
Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?
this doesn't really matter. Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might have been distributed under that license.
having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases.
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
I'm sure they will
2017-08-21 9:11 GMT-03:00 Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com:
Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.
On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote:
(Sending again, in thread)
Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?
this doesn't really matter. Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might have been distributed under that license.
having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Question posted: https://github.com/uliss/pure-data/issues/46 https://github.com/uliss/pure-data/issues/46
On Aug 21, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.
On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote:
(Sending again, in thread)
Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?
this doesn't really matter. Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might have been distributed under that license.
having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases.
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
-
Alexandre Torres Porres -
Dan Wilcox