On Aug 21, 2017, at 2:11 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:

Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.

On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote:

(Sending again, in thread)

Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?

this doesn't really matter.
Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might
have been distributed under that license.

having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number
of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases.