Ok. At the very least, I can reach out to the authors and see if they would agree to the port.On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
On 2017-08-20 19:51, Dan Wilcox wrote:(Sending again, in thread)
Even if a lot of those changes come from Pd-extended? Kind of forward-back-porting?
this doesn't really matter.
Pd-extended itself aimed towards GPL-3, so a lot of patches for Pd might
have been distributed under that license.
having a(ny) pedigree makes re-licensing more complicated, as the number
of parties that must agree to re-licensing increases.
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev