Pd-dev October 2012

pd-dev@lists.iem.at

12 participants
92 discussions

[ pure-data-Bugs-3578746 ] Seriously! A non-2^n-BS bug!
by SourceForge.net 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

Bugs item #3578746, was opened at 2012-10-20 10:47 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3578746&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Seriously! A non-2^n-BS bug! Initial Comment: I'm really not a 'spammer'! ...nor a hypochondriac... I've tested several versions of pd (0.42.5 - 0.43.3 (ext/van)). None of them is working with non-2^n-BSes! On the mailing-list ( http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-dev@iem.at/msg11344.html ), Claude Heiland-Allen states that it is already implemented.. (Thanks Claude) But I can't confirm that. I've tried the patch he posted there, - without success: The blocksize is always rounded to the next bigger power of 2, it seems! I don't know what he's on, but I'm on windows. Maybe that makes the difference.. (Is this a hardware- or Os-dependent feature..??) Please take a look at the attached pd-patch. It's my attempt to work out the problem.. If someone could give me a resonable answer, I promise I'll never come back again ;) ...for this issue... PS: It feels a little annoying if one does not get a real response or not a response at all! (Eg. look at the feature requests. The last one on the 1st page is like 2 years old, so you can't say there are too many to respond to each one..). This especially is true if the response is longer than the acual answer like "Yes", "No" or "I don't know". That would have been a big help for me already. Although it's not making the bug disappear automatically... Anything like if it is a useful/good idea is something I'd like to know, when posting something, for exapmle.. But no, I won't be scared away so easily.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3578746&group_…

1 0

[ pure-data-Patches-3578559 ] kamagra forum
by SourceForge.net 20 Oct '12

20 Oct '12

Patches item #3578559, was opened at 2012-10-19 20:50 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3578559&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: externals Group: feature Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: kamagra forum Initial Comment: kamagra forum ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3578559&group_…

1 0

auto builds for libs in trunk/externals/
by Hans-Christoph Steiner 19 Oct '12

19 Oct '12

I have set up automatic builds direct from trunk/externals of SVN for all libraries that are based on the Library Template[1]. It runs the script trunk/externals/build-all-libdirs.sh whenever there is a new commit anywhere in trunk/externals/. Its currently building on debian-stable-amd64 debian-testing-amd64 macosx105-i386 macosx105-powerpc, and macosx106-x86_64. Hopefully I'll get some Windows builds up there too. [1] https://puredata.info/docs/developer/LibraryTemplate/ .hc

2 1

gop properties settings
by Patrice Colet 19 Oct '12

19 Oct '12

Hello, I'd like to report a bug but I'm not allowed to do this on sourceforge bugtracker. - right click on a subpatch -> properties - disable gop nothing happens it only works when right clicking inside a subpatch Colet Patrice

2 1

[ pure-data-Patches-3577728 ] menu edit - undo & redo command error
by SourceForge.net 19 Oct '12

19 Oct '12

Patches item #3577728, was opened at 2012-10-16 14:22 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by eighthave You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3577728&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. >Category: pd-extended >Group: None Status: Open >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to: Miller Puckette (millerpuckette) Summary: menu edit - undo & redo command error Initial Comment: Pd-extended 0.43.1, Windows 7 64, Intel Core i7 Undo and redo command from edit menu show this error message: wrong # args: should be "menu_undo" wrong # args: should be "menu_undo" while executing "menu_undo $::focused_window" (menu invoke) wrong # args: should be "menu_redo" wrong # args: should be "menu_redo" while executing "menu_redo $::focused_window" (menu invoke) CTRL+Z and SHIFT+CTRL+Z works well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3577728&group_…

1 0

[ pure-data-Bugs-3578095 ] netreceive doesn't work in batch mode
by SourceForge.net 18 Oct '12

18 Oct '12

Bugs item #3578095, was opened at 2012-10-18 06:12 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3578095&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: puredata Group: v0.42 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: netreceive doesn't work in batch mode Initial Comment: [netreceive] in -batch mode doesn't work, it binds the port but doesn't seem to output anything. netstat shows a large receive queue, which presumably contains my incoming data. $ pd -batch my-netreceive-r.pd & ... $ netstat -au Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State udp 75264 0 *:5### *:* ... $ pd -version Pd version 0.42-6 compiled 13:48:58 Feb 17 2012 My specific use case is "one core for as-fast-as-possible analysis of an dsp system's parameter space, another for realtime/live audio, communicating via loopback network ", which perhaps is too far from the realms of sanity? Some awkward workarounds spring to mind using -nogui instead (using a switch~'d off wrapper patch and bang it when I want dsp to run; or using a very high upsampling ratio and compensating any input to objects that use the samplerate, ...) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3578095&group_…

1 0

Re: [PD-dev] [ pure-data-Feature Requests-3578019 ] I'd like to...
by Claude Heiland-Allen 18 Oct '12

18 Oct '12

Hi, On 18/10/12 08:39, SourceForge.net wrote: > Feature Requests item #3578019, was opened at 2012-10-18 00:39 It's already implemented... > Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > Summary: I'd like to... > > Initial Comment: > ..know if it is possible to use other than "2^n"-blocksizes?! Not for audio connected to a dac~, but for offline stuff it works (some buggy objects might not cooperate). > You know, I've read about that, and now I wonder if the info or the implementation is bugged.. Works for me following the somewhat-cryptic guidance in [switch~]'s help, see attached. Note that dsp must be on globally, but switched off for the particular canvas, for this to make sense. Also bang->switch~ seems to compute a dsp block immediately, so remember to use trigger when applicable to initialise your signal objects in that patch. Perhaps it wouldn't hurt to have a small example somewhat along these lines in the help patch. Claude -- http://mathr.co.uk

1 0

[ pure-data-Feature Requests-3578019 ] I'd like to...
by SourceForge.net 18 Oct '12

18 Oct '12

Feature Requests item #3578019, was opened at 2012-10-18 00:39 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478073&aid=3578019&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I'd like to... Initial Comment: ..know if it is possible to use other than "2^n"-blocksizes?! You know, I've read about that, and now I wonder if the info or the implementation is bugged.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478073&aid=3578019&group_…

1 0

[ pure-data-Bugs-3577882 ] Blocksize not power of 2?
by SourceForge.net 17 Oct '12

17 Oct '12

Bugs item #3577882, was opened at 2012-10-17 11:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3577882&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Blocksize not power of 2? Initial Comment: If I won't get it here, there is no answer to this question: I've heard that a "non-2^n-BS" is possible to but I can't confirm this with some quick tests.. So is it possible or not?! Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3577882&group_…

1 0

[ pure-data-Bugs-3577728 ] menu edit - undo & redo command error
by SourceForge.net 16 Oct '12

16 Oct '12

Bugs item #3577728, was opened at 2012-10-16 14:22 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3577728&group_… Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pd-extended Group: v0.43 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Summary: menu edit - undo & redo command error Initial Comment: Pd-extended 0.43.1, Windows 7 64, Intel Core i7 Undo and redo command from edit menu show this error message: wrong # args: should be "menu_undo" wrong # args: should be "menu_undo" while executing "menu_undo $::focused_window" (menu invoke) wrong # args: should be "menu_redo" wrong # args: should be "menu_redo" while executing "menu_redo $::focused_window" (menu invoke) CTRL+Z and SHIFT+CTRL+Z works well ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3577728&group_…

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Pd-dev October 2012