ok i installed the last GEM - pictures seem to be ok now.
Суббота, 15 июня 2013, 2:08 +04:00 от Фывапр Олджэвич tofuckof@inbox.ru:
and what do you think about the quality of the images (the "old-tv effect") ? can it be fixed ?
tnx
Пятница, 14 июня 2013, 21:13 +02:00 от IOhannes zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at:
On 06/14/2013 08:20 PM, Фывапр Олджэвич wrote:
- also with the [makefilename] thing i can't make names like "test00001.jpg" because the [test0000%d.jpg] after 10 will provide names like "test000017.jpg" but not "test00017.jpg" (i mean it keeps the number of zeroes)..
and the [test%5d.jpg] somehow provides names with spaces, not zeroes.. it look like "test 1.jpg" . regarding that i can't really change names while saving the images with [pix_writer] or [pix_write] - the slideshow is finished at the 10th slide..
can you advice what to do ?
ah, should have been "%05d"
- abstractions/pix_writer.pd
- where can i look it ? didn't find in pd folder such directory ..
if it's not in your installation, check in the repository, e.g. on github or on sourceforge.
== my system is : PC \ Windows 7 Home \ Core i7 \ 6 GB \ Nvidia GT 650M 2 G \ Pd-extended 42.5 \ GEM 0.92.3
probably you should upgrade to Gem-0.93.
usually newer releases fix a number of bugs.
gsamdr IOhannes
-- Максим Иванов _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
