ok i installed the last GEM - pictures seem to be ok now. 


Суббота, 15 июня 2013, 2:08 +04:00 от Фывапр Олджэвич <tofuckof@inbox.ru>:
and what do you think about the quality of the images (the "old-tv effect") ? can it be fixed ? 

tnx

Пятница, 14 июня 2013, 21:13 +02:00 от IOhannes zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>:
On 06/14/2013 08:20 PM, Фывапр Олджэвич wrote:
>
> 2) also with the [makefilename] thing i can't make names like "test00001.jpg" because the [test0000%d.jpg] after 10 will provide names like "test000017.jpg" but not "test00017.jpg" (i mean it keeps the number of zeroes)..
> and the [test%5d.jpg] somehow provides names with spaces, not zeroes.. it look like "test 1.jpg" .
> regarding that i can't really change names while saving the images with [pix_writer] or [pix_write] - the slideshow is finished at the 10th slide..
>
> can you advice what to do ?

ah, should have been "%05d"

>
> 3) abstractions/pix_writer.pd
>
> - where can i look it ? didn't find in pd folder such directory ..

if it's not in your installation, check in the repository, e.g. on
github or on sourceforge.

>
> == my system is : PC \ Windows 7 Home \ Core i7 \ 6 GB \ Nvidia GT 650M 2 G \ Pd-extended 42.5 \ GEM 0.92.3

probably you should upgrade to Gem-0.93.

usually newer releases fix a number of bugs.


gsamdr
IOhannes


--
Максим Иванов
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
GEM-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev



--
Максим Иванов