On 07/31/2015 04:23 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 07/31/2015 10:12 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-dev wrote:
On 07/31/2015 03:15 PM, Jamie Bullock wrote:
How about: authors / maintainers can host their externals wherever they like, but we maintain a “meta” repository on GitHub that includes all the various external [sic] repositories as git submodules…?
And why do you prefer Github to Sourceforge?
s/GitHub/git.puredata.info/
i don't think that jamie's point was to propose GitHub, but rather a central point that would reference the various repositories.
I'm not getting the point of all this. If you require a central point to reference the random collection of repos for the purpose of discoverability and sanity (and you _do_ require a central point for both), why go to the trouble of decentralizing the central repo?
In the original scheme I would just keep bothering you or Hans to give commit access to someone wanting to adopt an external lib. In the new scheme will I just keep bothering you until you add a reference to the centralized list?
-Jonathan
it could be a gitweb instance running on http://git.puredata.info/ with a single admin user.
gfmards IOhannes
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev