On 07/31/2015 04:23 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 07/31/2015 10:12 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-dev wrote:
On 07/31/2015 03:15 PM, Jamie Bullock wrote:
How about: authors / maintainers can host their externals wherever
they like, but we maintain a “meta” repository on GitHub that includes
all the various external [sic] repositories as git submodules…?

And why do you prefer Github to Sourceforge?

s/GitHub/git.puredata.info/

i don't think that jamie's point was to propose GitHub, but rather a
central point that would reference the various repositories.

I'm not getting the point of all this.  If you require a central point
to reference the random collection of repos for the purpose of
discoverability and sanity (and you _do_ require a central point
for both), why go to the trouble of decentralizing the central
repo?

In the original scheme I would just keep bothering you or Hans
to give commit access to someone wanting to adopt an external
lib.  In the new scheme will I just keep bothering you until you add
a reference to the centralized list?

-Jonathan

it could be a gitweb instance running on http://git.puredata.info/ with
a single admin user.

gfmards
IOhannes



_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev