On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote:
I rather doubt this can relly help given the way Pd uses Tcl/Tk. (I still have a pet idea on the other hand of simply parsing the TCL code and passing it to GTK :)
All those in favor of a GTK GUI for pd say I.
IIIIIII!
rich.
cheers M
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:26:00PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Now that I have discovered this bytecode caching feature, I am curious if the changes I made have made any performance differences. Also, matju mentioned that the bytecode caching probably works better if reusing procs, so it could make sense to have sys_vgui calls use Tcl procs, so that the bytecode gets reused.
I was also thinking that perhaps sys_vgui communications could use Tcl_Obj references instead of sending whole lines of Tcl, but that might get overly complicated.
.hc
http://at.or.at/hans/
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev