On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:26:00PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Now that I have discovered this bytecode caching feature, I am
> curious if the changes I made have made any performance differences.
> Also, matju mentioned that the bytecode caching probably works better
> if reusing procs, so it could make sense to have sys_vgui calls use
> Tcl procs, so that the bytecode gets reused.
>
> I was also thinking that perhaps sys_vgui communications could use
> Tcl_Obj references instead of sending whole lines of Tcl, but that
> might get overly complicated.
>
> .hc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
>
http://at.or.at/hans/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
>
PD-dev@iem.at
>
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev