Hey,
So what should be the core mission of the pure-data repository? It
looks like it is time to have that discussion again. I see it as a
gathering of code and docs that are intended to be built using a
common build system (aka Pd-extended build system).
As for Pd-extended, I think it is a mistake (almost all my fault)
including so many things in the package. It is now clear to me that
makes more sense to have a distro that includes only the very stable
libraries, then to make Pd fully support external libdirs, including
shared libs, help patches, example patches, manuals, etc.
I think then there could be a simple distro system like Eclipse has
for managing plugins. (Basically, there is a simple format for
posting a library to a website. The user then adds the repo URL to
the program, which then has a browser for all available installation
options and updates).
I guess this was a bit vague and wandering, but it seems that there
is a discussion that needs to be had.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic.
It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and
expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war
on terrorism. - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom