---
** [bugs:#241] [pix_film] no longer responds to incoming frame numbers**
**Status:** open **OS:** w32 **Release:** unknown **Created:** Mon May 25, 2015 10:39 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Mon May 25, 2015 10:39 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody
win7 64 bit GEM 93.3/1/0
[pix_film] no longer responds to incoming frame numbers. tested with .avi, .mov, .mp4.
[pix_film]: loaded file: C:/Users/brandt/Desktop/raspberry/steve/Steve_Jobs_39_2005_Stanford_Commencement_Address.mov with 1 frames (320x240) at -1.000000 fps
yours sincerely
2brandt63@gmail.com
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because gem-dev@lists.iem.at is subscribed to http://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/bugs/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at http://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
- **status**: open --> closed - **Comment**:
while i'm not entirely sure i understand the problem or the solution, i close this on the OP's request.
---
** [bugs:#241] [pix_film] no longer responds to incoming frame numbers**
**Status:** closed **OS:** w32 **Release:** unknown **Created:** Mon May 25, 2015 10:39 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Tue May 26, 2015 08:20 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody
win7 64 bit GEM 93.3/1/0
[pix_film] no longer responds to incoming frame numbers. tested with .avi, .mov, .mp4.
[pix_film]: loaded file: C:/Users/brandt/Desktop/raspberry/steve/Steve_Jobs_39_2005_Stanford_Commencement_Address.mov with 1 frames (320x240) at -1.000000 fps
yours sincerely
2brandt63@gmail.com
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because gem-dev@lists.iem.at is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/bugs/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
no.
the "1" really means "prefer the film-decoding backend #1" (instead of, e.g. #0), it has nothing to do with frame-wise access. the fact that it worked for you is mainly because on *your specific setup* the backend #0 does not support frame-accurate seeking, whereas #1 does support it. the film-decoding backends are plugins (look out for "gem_film*.dll" files), so there is absolutely no way to guarantee that "1" will have a specific behaviour.
also, i want to discourage people from using enumeration values ("1") for selecting the preferred backend (it was a bad idea in the first place), instead one should use names ("QuickTime", "DirectShow",...)
---
** [bugs:#241] [pix_film] no longer responds to incoming frame numbers**
**Status:** closed **OS:** w32 **Release:** unknown **Created:** Mon May 25, 2015 10:39 AM UTC by Anonymous **Last Updated:** Fri May 29, 2015 10:33 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody
win7 64 bit GEM 93.3/1/0
[pix_film] no longer responds to incoming frame numbers. tested with .avi, .mov, .mp4.
[pix_film]: loaded file: C:/Users/brandt/Desktop/raspberry/steve/Steve_Jobs_39_2005_Stanford_Commencement_Address.mov with 1 frames (320x240) at -1.000000 fps
yours sincerely
2brandt63@gmail.com
---
Sent from sourceforge.net because gem-dev@lists.iem.at is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/bugs/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
-
"IOhannes m zmölnig" -
Ticket 241