Is there anyone out there that has built a version of GEM for Intel Macs??
Alexander Mitchell B.Mus.St(Composition)Honours alexander.mitchell@student.adelaide.edu.au PH: +61 8 8449 7991 MOB: 04 3884 9443
Yes. There is an older test version at tigital.com
On 10/5/06, Alexander Mitchell alexander.mitchell@student.adelaide.edu.au wrote:
Is there anyone out there that has built a version of GEM for Intel Macs??
Alexander Mitchell B.Mus.St(Composition)Honours alexander.mitchell@student.adelaide.edu.au PH: +61 8 8449 7991 MOB: 04 3884 9443
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
But unfortunately it doesn't work with the latest Pd 0.40-0 (the only version actually working on Mac Intels)...
S
Yes. There is an older test version at tigital.com
On 10/5/06, Alexander Mitchell alexander.mitchell@student.adelaide.edu.au wrote:
Is there anyone out there that has built a version of GEM for Intel Macs??
Alexander Mitchell B.Mus.St(Composition)Honours alexander.mitchell@student.adelaide.edu.au PH: +61 8 8449 7991 MOB: 04 3884 9443
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
On 10/5/06, Stefano Papetti papetti@sci.univr.it wrote:
But unfortunately it doesn't work with the latest Pd 0.40-0 (the only version actually working on Mac Intels)...
It works absolutely fine with 0.39. I did the damned ports and it has worked on the Mactels here longer than anywhere else and well before 0.40appeared. Please stop saying it doesn't work because you are wrong.
Sorry for the harshness of the reply. This stuff does work, I use it daily and there is no reason why others could not as well.
On 10/5/06, chris clepper cgclepper@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/5/06, Stefano Papetti papetti@sci.univr.it wrote:
But unfortunately it doesn't work with the latest Pd 0.40-0 (the only version actually working on Mac Intels)...
It works absolutely fine with 0.39. I did the damned ports and it has worked on the Mactels here longer than anywhere else and well before 0.40appeared. Please stop saying it doesn't work because you are wrong.
No problem for the harshness...
Puckette himself told me (by email of course) to use 0.40 when I was wondering why my externals didn't work with Pd 0.39-2 on a Intel Mac. They compiled but then didn't work. Conversely, they did with Win and Linux! Puckette told me there were problems in 0.39 on Mac Intels. But, of course, Pd 0.39-2 starts, and to some degree works on Intel Macs.
Still, note that every external I compiled with previous versions of Pd works also in 0.40 with Windows and Linux. This means that, as I already said, the 0.40 has something new about IMacs, and the 0.39 has something wrong. Not your GEM version! Rather: thank you for it, it's the only actual way to use GEM on Intel Macs... but unfortunately not jointly with my externals...
S
Sorry for the harshness of the reply. This stuff does work, I use it daily and there is no reason why others could not as well.
On 10/5/06, chris clepper cgclepper@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/5/06, Stefano Papetti papetti@sci.univr.it wrote:
But unfortunately it doesn't work with the latest Pd 0.40-0 (the only version actually working on Mac Intels)...
It works absolutely fine with 0.39. I did the damned ports and it has worked on the Mactels here longer than anywhere else and well before 0.40appeared. Please stop saying it doesn't work because you are wrong.
On 10/5/06, Stefano Papetti papetti@sci.univr.it wrote:
But unfortunately it doesn't work with the latest Pd 0.40-0 (the only version actually working on Mac Intels)...
I just built a GEM version with no changes and it loads in 0.40. Is there an error when you load GEM in 0.40? That old version might not have a statically linked libfreetype and/or FTGL.
hi all.
please do use subjects! (i would _love_ to autoreject emails with no subjects)
chris clepper wrote:
On 10/5/06, Stefano Papetti papetti@sci.univr.it wrote:
But unfortunately it doesn't work with the latest Pd 0.40-0 (the only version actually working on Mac Intels)...
I just built a GEM version with no changes and it loads in 0.40. Is there an error when you load GEM in 0.40? That old version might not have a statically linked libfreetype and/or FTGL.
thanks chris.
i uploaded it to, so it can be fetched from the usual places: http://gem.iem.at/download.html ftp://ftp.iem.at/pub/pd/Externals/GEM/SNAPSHOTS
the packages are called gem-CVS20061005-OSX-i686-bin-doc.tar.gz and gem-CVS20061005-OSX-i686-bin.tar.gz
mfg.asdr IOhannes
Hey it works!!! Thanks a lot!
You're right about you previous Intel version. Here's the (now old) error:
/Users/Stefano/pd_externs/Gem.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Users/Stefano/pd_externs/Gem.pd_darwin, 10): Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.6.dylib Referenced from: /Users/Stefano/pd_externs/Gem.pd_darwin Reason: image not found Gem: can't load library
Best, Stefano
On 10/5/06, Stefano Papetti papetti@sci.univr.it wrote:
But unfortunately it doesn't work with the latest Pd 0.40-0 (the only version actually working on Mac Intels)...
I just built a GEM version with no changes and it loads in 0.40. Is there an error when you load GEM in 0.40? That old version might not have a statically linked libfreetype and/or FTGL.
-
Alexander Mitchell -
chris clepper -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Stefano Papetti