hi all.
due to the discussion on pd-dev whether we should switch to subversion, i have set-up an svn-server at puredata.info and created a mirror of the pd-gem repository: https://svn.puredata.info/svnroot/gem/ (note that this mirror is some days old, so the newest changes (videoIO) will not be there)
since the developer-base of Gem is rather small, i think we could simply give it a try. the users would be the same as for the puredata.info portal.
what do you think?
basically we could do the switch anytime.
mfg.asdr IOhannes
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
hi all.
due to the discussion on pd-dev whether we should switch to subversion, i have set-up an svn-server at puredata.info and created a mirror of the pd-gem repository: https://svn.puredata.info/svnroot/gem/ (note that this mirror is some days old, so the newest changes (videoIO) will not be there)
since the developer-base of Gem is rather small, i think we could simply give it a try. the users would be the same as for the puredata.info portal.
what do you think?
basically we could do the switch anytime.
well, at least after i have the login-names of the developers... if you have forgotten yours, i think it would be better to mail me and we can try to find and reactivate the old one, instead of just creating a new one.
fma.sdr IOhannes
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
since the developer-base of Gem is rather small, i think we could simply give it a try. the users would be the same as for the puredata.info portal. what do you think? basically we could do the switch anytime.
What do you think of SVN's branch system? Have you used it yet?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
since the developer-base of Gem is rather small, i think we could simply give it a try. the users would be the same as for the puredata.info portal. what do you think? basically we could do the switch anytime.
What do you think of SVN's branch system? Have you used it yet?
yes. i like it better than the CVS way of doing things. it makes me less confused.
fmgas.dör IOhannes
What are the advantages of using SVN compared to CVS for our purposes?
On 7/9/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
hi all.
due to the discussion on pd-dev whether we should switch to subversion, i have set-up an svn-server at puredata.info and created a mirror of the pd-gem repository: https://svn.puredata.info/svnroot/gem/ (note that this mirror is some days old, so the newest changes (videoIO) will not be there)
since the developer-base of Gem is rather small, i think we could simply give it a try. the users would be the same as for the puredata.info portal.
what do you think?
basically we could do the switch anytime.
mfg.asdr IOhannes
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
chris clepper wrote:
What are the advantages of using SVN compared to CVS for our purposes?
well, i guess the adavantages are not _that_ huge compared to what e.g. the pd-cvs would gain from switching to subversion.
here are a few:
- cleanup of the repository files: renaming of files like my "pix_filmNEW" to something which like "pix_filmBETTER" (only joking), or to something really meaningful.
- cleanup of the repository structure (remove unused directories, like ./src/yuv or ./src/Gnu without losing the history)
- keep the directory structure of branches tidy: in CVS you cannot create a directory in one branch which does not exist in the other branches. for example, like the current videoIO project of thomas: in an svn repository his commits would be totally invisible to the "trunk", he could just work on his branch and do whatever he wanted (e.g. create/delete directories,...)
- and finally: if pure-data's cvs is to switch to subversion one time and it is to be hosted at puredata.info (these are all "ifs" and "whens" to be decided not by me), then i would like to have tried this out in real world beforehand.
mfg.adr IOhannes