...trying to revive this, I've made some comments on the following pages:
http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/MultipleWindows http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/ContextNames
...nothing major, just fleshing out...but it seems that we may be ready to go ahead and code some more: I'll be working on this tonight (at least getting it back to compiling on osx again!)
jamie
How about moving GemWiki to puredata.org/dev/GemWiki? That is the place to put such things. http://puredata.org/dev/pddp is there for example.
Yay wikis!
.hc
On Dec 15, 2005, at 3:24 PM, james tittle wrote:
...trying to revive this, I've made some comments on the following pages:
http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/MultipleWindows http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/ContextNames
...nothing major, just fleshing out...but it seems that we may be ready to go ahead and code some more: I'll be working on this tonight (at least getting it back to compiling on osx again!)
jamie
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
________________________________________________________________________ ____
"Information wants to be free." -Stewart Brand
On Dec 15, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
How about moving GemWiki to puredata.org/dev/GemWiki? That is the place to put such things. http://puredata.org/dev/pddp is there for example.
...sounds good to me, but I went to puredata.org/dev and couldn't edit the page or add a new page: maybe this is something for IOhannes to do with his magical admin powers!
jamie
On Dec 15, 2005, at 3:24 PM, james tittle wrote:
...trying to revive this, I've made some comments on the following pages:
http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/MultipleWindows http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/ContextNames
...nothing major, just fleshing out...but it seems that we may be ready to go ahead and code some more: I'll be working on this tonight (at least getting it back to compiling on osx again!)
jamie
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
"Information wants to be free." -Stewart Brand
james tittle wrote:
On Dec 15, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
How about moving GemWiki to puredata.org/dev/GemWiki? That is the place to put such things. http://puredata.org/dev/pddp is there for example.
...sounds good to me, but I went to puredata.org/dev and couldn't edit the page or add a new page: maybe this is something for IOhannes to do with his magical admin powers!
i moved the wiki to http://puredata.info/dev/gemwiki/
mfg.asdr. IOhannes
On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
james tittle wrote:
On Dec 15, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
How about moving GemWiki to puredata.org/dev/GemWiki? That is the place to put such things. http://puredata.org/dev/pddp is there for example.
...sounds good to me, but I went to puredata.org/dev and couldn't edit the page or add a new page: maybe this is something for IOhannes to do with his magical admin powers!
i moved the wiki to http://puredata.info/dev/gemwiki/
...thanks for doing this: but it doesn't seem to be accessible from http://puredata.info/dev/ ...seems like it should go under "Development WIKIs", or also be in the navigation sidebar?
jamie
On Dec 16, 2005, at 11:33 AM, james tittle wrote:
On Dec 16, 2005, at 9:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
james tittle wrote:
On Dec 15, 2005, at 7:04 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
How about moving GemWiki to puredata.org/dev/GemWiki? That is the place to put such things. http://puredata.org/dev/pddp is there for example.
...sounds good to me, but I went to puredata.org/dev and couldn't edit the page or add a new page: maybe this is something for IOhannes to do with his magical admin powers!
i moved the wiki to http://puredata.info/dev/gemwiki/
...thanks for doing this: but it doesn't seem to be accessible from http://puredata.info/dev/ ...seems like it should go under "Development WIKIs", or also be in the navigation sidebar?
It needed to be "published". Its in the nav sidebar now.
.hc
________________________________________________________________________ ____
"Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is related to the telescope." -Edsger Dykstra
Hi Jamie,
What methods does the gemcontrol object accept, and the gemwindow?
I'm having trouble understanding where gemwin functionality is split between the objects?
create,destroy,0,1,color,dimen,offset,border,view are all in gemwindow and can be controled from each gemwindow seperatly? Is the framerate the only method the gemcontrol object has?
Also I think a combination of render priorities work best for rendering to both pbuffers and windows:
[gemhead 1 mywindow]
[gemhead 2 mywindow]
[gemhead 1 mybuffer]
[gemhead 2 mybuffer]
I find the idea of using only render priority ranges to specify which offscreen buffer that gem-head gets rendered to quite awkward.
Since its a new argument to [gemhead] then it should not break any patches, and no argument would simply default to the first gemwindow.
What do you think?
b.
james tittle wrote:
...trying to revive this, I've made some comments on the following pages:
http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/MultipleWindows http://puredata.org/Members/zmoelnig/GemWiki/ContextNames
...nothing major, just fleshing out...but it seems that we may be ready to go ahead and code some more: I'll be working on this tonight (at least getting it back to compiling on osx again!)
jamie
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
hey ben,
On Dec 18, 2005, at 11:25 AM, B. Bogart wrote:
What methods does the gemcontrol object accept, and the gemwindow?
http://puredata.info/dev/gemwiki/GemcontrolGemoutput ...this is kinda old, but we've got revision 2 working atm...subject to change, of course...
I'm having trouble understanding where gemwin functionality is split between the objects?
...so far, [gemcontrol] doesn't seem to do much that can be manipulated...
create,destroy,0,1,color,dimen,offset,border,view are all in gemwindow and can be controled from each gemwindow seperatly? Is the framerate the only method the gemcontrol object has?
...yup...
Also I think a combination of render priorities work best for rendering to both pbuffers and windows:
[gemhead 1 mywindow]
[gemhead 2 mywindow]
[gemhead 1 mybuffer]
[gemhead 2 mybuffer]
...ok, it took me a second glance to see what the diff was here, but you're suggesting that each "windowed context" has it's own render priorities, which I think has been brought up before, and certainly is still on the table...this also means that we'd need to figure out a way of determining which gets rendered to first, "mywindow" or "mybuffer"...? Seems obvious to us, but not so obvious if we just allow anyold name for a buffer...here's where we might have uses for multiple [gemcontrol]'s, such that some are for buffers while others are for outputs...
I find the idea of using only render priority ranges to specify which offscreen buffer that gem-head gets rendered to quite awkward.
Since its a new argument to [gemhead] then it should not break any patches, and no argument would simply default to the first gemwindow.
What do you think?
...yes, this is all how we've discussed, except for the offscreen windows, which the more I work with and think about, the more my ideas change about how they should be treated...besides the fact that they have no border/titlebar and are never seen, they're also different in that they may be rendered to many times per render cycle (if reused), whereas the onscreen windows are only rendered flushed once per fps...
...I'll definitely be mulling this over the holidays...
jamie
-
B. Bogart -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
james tittle