Gents,
I would like to control 2 patches with 2 separate Gemwins, where with one bang from a [send] object I create from 1 patch a gemwin while destroying the other Gemwin in the other patch. For some reason the processor is extremely slow when I add to gemwin a numeric sign like [gemwin 1] and [gemwin 2]. If I do not indicate gemwin any way, the sender switches off both gemwin at once or printing that Gem window is already created. What is the right solution?
Thanks in advance:
Popesz
hello, gem is not able to create 2 gem window. all gemwin object control the same window. that a known limitation.
when creating "gemwin 1" you just ask for 1fps, so it look slow.
you can use 2 pd if you wish 2 gem windows.
cheers c
Le 28/02/2013 21:10, Elektro Moon a écrit :
Gents,
I would like to control 2 patches with 2 separate Gemwins, where with one bang from a [send] object I create from 1 patch a gemwin while destroying the other Gemwin in the other patch. For some reason the processor is extremely slow when I add to gemwin a numeric sign like [gemwin 1] and [gemwin 2]. If I do not indicate gemwin any way, the sender switches off both gemwin at once or printing that Gem window is already created. What is the right solution?
Thanks in advance:
Popesz
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
Cyrille,
I am totally aware of this limitation. What I thought, if I closed the first Gem window before opening the second from the 2nd patch, it would have worked. No luck. If I open 2 pd, can I send bang from one PD to the other pd as well?
Thanks for your advice!
Popesz
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Cyrille Henry ch@chnry.net wrote:
hello, gem is not able to create 2 gem window. all gemwin object control the same window. that a known limitation.
when creating "gemwin 1" you just ask for 1fps, so it look slow.
you can use 2 pd if you wish 2 gem windows.
cheers c
Le 28/02/2013 21:10, Elektro Moon a écrit :
Gents,
I would like to control 2 patches with 2 separate Gemwins, where with one bang from a [send] object I create from 1 patch a gemwin while destroying the other Gemwin in the other patch. For some reason the processor is extremely slow when I add to gemwin a numeric sign like [gemwin 1] and [gemwin 2]. If I do not indicate gemwin any way, the sender switches off both gemwin at once or printing that Gem window is already created. What is the right solution?
Thanks in advance:
Popesz
*
Le 28/02/2013 21:29, Elektro Moon a écrit :
Cyrille,
I am totally aware of this limitation. What I thought, if I closed the first Gem window before opening the second from the 2nd patch, it would have worked. No luck.
nope, all gemhead render in the only gemwindows.
If I open 2 pd, can I send bang from one PD to the other pd as well?
yes, use netsend / netreceive.
cheers c
Thanks for your advice!
Popesz
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Cyrille Henry <ch@chnry.net mailto:ch@chnry.net> wrote:
hello, gem is not able to create 2 gem window. all gemwin object control the same window. that a known limitation. when creating "gemwin 1" you just ask for 1fps, so it look slow. you can use 2 pd if you wish 2 gem windows. cheers c Le 28/02/2013 21:10, Elektro Moon a écrit : Gents, I would like to control 2 patches with 2 separate Gemwins, where with one bang from a [send] object I create from 1 patch a gemwin while destroying the other Gemwin in the other patch. For some reason the processor is extremely slow when I add to gemwin a numeric sign like [gemwin 1] and [gemwin 2]. If I do not indicate gemwin any way, the sender switches off both gemwin at once or printing that Gem window is already created. What is the right solution? Thanks in advance: Popesz/ /
GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
On 02/28/2013 21:35, Cyrille Henry wrote:
Le 28/02/2013 21:29, Elektro Moon a écrit :
Cyrille,
I am totally aware of this limitation. What I thought, if I closed the first Gem window before opening the second from the 2nd patch, it would have worked. No luck.
nope, all gemhead render in the only gemwindows.
If I open 2 pd, can I send bang from one PD to the other pd as well?
yes, use netsend / netreceive.
better still: render only the things that you want displayed. rather than switching between two windows, turn on/off the [gemhead]s you want to display at any given time.
a simple [gemgrouphead] abstraction to be used instead of [gemhead] can simplify all this:
[r gemgroup] | [== $2] | [gemhead $1] | [outlet]
and then use the following to selectively render a given group.
[hsl] | [s gemgroup]
[gemgrouphead 50 0] | [square]
[gemgrouphead 50 1] | [circle]
fgmasdr IOhannes
On 01/03/13 15:35, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
better still: render only the things that you want displayed. rather than switching between two windows, turn on/off the [gemhead]s you want to display at any given time.
and if you really do need to create new windows ... say if you are using a window manager that places them automatically by title, or if you are swapping between 2 displays, or you want small windows in different positions on the desktop ... then use something like:
[0, destroy, <some new window details>, create, 1( | [gemwin]
Simon
Iohannes,
I tried your solution, works like a charm! thanks a lot!
Popesz
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Simon Wise simonzwise@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/03/13 15:35, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
better still: render only the things that you want displayed. rather than switching between two windows, turn on/off the [gemhead]s you want to display at any given time.
and if you really do need to create new windows ... say if you are using a window manager that places them automatically by title, or if you are swapping between 2 displays, or you want small windows in different positions on the desktop ... then use something like:
[0, destroy, <some new window details>, create, 1( | [gemwin]
Simon
______________________________**_________________ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/**listinfo/gem-devhttp://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
-
Cyrille Henry -
Elektro Moon -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Simon Wise