Hey Gem Devs,
Seems someone changed the gemwin creation stuff in the 07.feedback example.
Unfortunately this breaks the patch, or rather makes the output ugly and non illustrative of feedback.
The patch is intended for a 512x512 window with lighting on. Seems the "gemwin" abstract does not (easily) allow these things.
So why was it changed in the first place?
Thanks, B.
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, B. Bogart wrote:
The patch is intended for a 512x512 window with lighting on. Seems the "gemwin" abstract does not (easily) allow these things. So why was it changed in the first place?
I have a different question : why did GEM only ever support one window ?
Not only multiple help patches will display in the same window, they will also overwrite each other's lighting settings and such.
_______________________________________________________________________ | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-01-12 19:24, B. Bogart wrote:
Hey Gem Devs,
Seems someone changed the gemwin creation stuff in the 07.feedback example.
Unfortunately this breaks the patch, or rather makes the output ugly and non illustrative of feedback.
apart from debatable "ugliness", i always found that it illustrates feedback just ok....
The patch is intended for a 512x512 window with lighting on. Seems the
true.
"gemwin" abstract does not (easily) allow these things.
not true.
So why was it changed in the first place?
probably it was just an oversight.
should be fixed in SVN now.
fgamsdr IOhannes
Thanks Johannes!
Your right, that was easy to fix.
With the lighting one can easily see the different iterations of feedback, which makes thing more clear.
Thanks for the quick fix. Ben
On 11-01-12 10:50 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2011-01-12 19:24, B. Bogart wrote:
Hey Gem Devs,
Seems someone changed the gemwin creation stuff in the 07.feedback example.
Unfortunately this breaks the patch, or rather makes the output ugly and non illustrative of feedback.
apart from debatable "ugliness", i always found that it illustrates feedback just ok....
The patch is intended for a 512x512 window with lighting on. Seems the
true.
"gemwin" abstract does not (easily) allow these things.
not true.
So why was it changed in the first place?
probably it was just an oversight.
should be fixed in SVN now.
fgamsdr IOhannes
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
-
B. Bogart -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Mathieu Bouchard