6 Feb
2006
6 Feb
'06
11:19 a.m.
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
hi.
if this is not feasible (because of more urgent matters) i would prefer to name it "pix_recordQT", instead of naming the common api-object "pix_recordNEW"; and put a HUGE "#warning" pragma into the source-file so people get reminded that something needs to be done.
done for now.
mfg.ad.s IOhannes